Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to re: Perhaps I was wrong.

re: "Do you concede that UFO's don't necessarily violate any known physical laws?"
alcaray — (archived)

Well of course they do! One of the main arguments that proponents make is that "they must be extraterrestrial because we can't do anything like that, nor explain how they could possibly accomplish that." You see it in descriptions of impossible feats of accelleration or change of direction; speeds across the sky that should produce continuous ear-splitting sonic booms and trails of ionized gas where no booms are reported across the state nor glimmering of gas noted as the sun set. You see it in all of the impossible things, for instance, that Lindy's investigators find about those crop circles (magnetic fields, wheat bent in mysterious ways, etc.).

And frankly yeah: how do you hover, without anything visible causing lift? Can you build me a model, with photos of it achieving this please? [No fair using out-of-shot equipment like electromagnets or blowers - means of lift has to be contained within the lifted body.]

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (109 posts)