UFO's do violate known physical laws and I figure that Hank says otherwise. (He has not responded so I do not know for sure.)
OK, lets look closely at the report of a saucer shape that was seen over the
O'Hare Airport.
What fundamental laws of physics were violated in that situation?
Report states that the object "hovered" under the cloud cover and then accelerated very rapidly going through the clouds and leaving a "hole in the cloud."
Hovering in the air is nothing mysterious, many insects do it, some birds do it, helicopters can do it and there are some other things that can hover.
Its not impossible to accelerate something at a very rapid rate, gun powder works very well in accelerating bullets to a high speed in a very short time.
Can both of these things be done silently, you ask. If the observers are telling the truth, then it is obvious that such things are possible. Just because you do not know how to accomplish such a thing, does not mean that it can not be done.
If you can not believe reliable witnesses, then you would not believe me either, no matter what words I might use when explaining it to you.
Thanks to Lindy you can also see a picture of a
"hovering" saucer shaped model that is internally powered.
Flame » in reply to re: "Do you concede that UFO's don't necessarily violate any known physical laws?"
re: You say that.....
The whole thread (109 posts)
- Symptoms of Pathological Skepticism.
- re: Symptoms of Pathological Behaviour (n/t)
- Just for the record:
- No...
- In Defense of Pathological Skepticism.
- That's not "pathological" skepticism
- Hoagland, the one thing you can't say about him is that he doesn't Believe.
- "Semantic"?
- 'Argument by dictonary definition' isn't an argument
- "And there, bunkie, I got ya: My definition of "lie" can be found in a dictionary. Where in the universe did you get yours?"..... Does the Mirriam-Webster dictionary count? You will, of course apolog…
- Yes, Damn it....
- "Semantic"?
- On the other hand...
- Hoagland, the one thing you can't say about him is that he doesn't Believe.
- re: Perhaps you are not a PATHOLOGICAL skeptic.
- Easter has been cancelled this year. They found the body.
- re: Perhaps I was wrong.
- No, I don't concede that.
- re: "Do you concede that UFO's don't necessarily violate any known physical laws?"
- re: Perhaps I was wrong.
- Easter has been cancelled this year. They found the body.
- That's not "pathological" skepticism
- The burden of proof is, as it has always been, on the most extraordinary claims. (n/t)
