I agree with Frank that it was probably bowser and only bowser. A few others were significantly above the mean in anti US rhetoric, but Raoul can't be accused of treason based on partial american ancestry and neither he nor anyone else was close to Bowser. I found Don's posts highly offensive to our troups, but probbaly would have defended him if anyone called him a traitor.
I miss Gary greatly, but don't blame him if the attacks on his freedom of speech drove him away. The Dumb and Loopy argument that dictionary definitions of treason aren't reasonable to apply on this board is the dumbest arguement I have ever heard otherwise intelligent people on this board ever make and the absolute most blatent case of herd mentality I have ever seen. BDS is another case, but at least it has a lot of issues to support it along with the distortions and downright lies.
Regards,
Mark
Flame » in reply to I don't think you could be more wrong, Tech
You Think Gary Was Talking About Someone Else?
The whole thread (75 posts)
- Liberation - then and now.
- As killers become more sophistocated, so do the defenders.
- Delayed "blast-resistant vehicles"
- Not sure of your point.
- I've often contended
- re: I've often contended
- See you and Bowser suffer from
- Female teachers?
- re: Female teachers?
- WTF?
- My god Tom. You actually wrote a post wherin I disagreed with nothing you said.
- No, not really.
- Hear, hear!
- Where's Mary Anne when you need her?
- But Techie...
- WTF?
- re: Female teachers?
- "Americans are now so namby-pamby that we don't want to offend the folks who want to kill us and whome we are trying to kill/immobilize."
- Female teachers?
