...because you can't seem to provide any reasons, in the end, other than that you trust the bush administration.
I suppose I should place my trust in Russia, Germany and France -all of who have placed their economic ties with Iraq above their regard for the US.
Did you consider any of my points or were you to busy with your rebuttals?
Did you even glance at the CIA report?
You're response to my Pearl Harbor remark shows where your trepidation lays. You’re afraid that we will be the "Bad Guys" because the rest of the world has not given us permission to strike.
Gary said the following:
"We all know torture is immoral. We also know the US is not supposed to wage preemptive war. It seems our new enemies compel us to redefine what we call "moral". This is probably necessary for our long term survival. However after having survived, we may find out that we have reduced ourselves to the moral level of our enemies."
The three of us share the same fears.
Two of us see war as a necessity.
One of us... better hope he's not right.
Current Events » in reply to Re: I got your point, it just wasn't a very good one.
Approaching "is too"/ "is not"
The whole thread (56 posts)
- yet another good view from the anti-war perspective
- A lot of fallacious argumentation
- Re: A lot of fallacious argumentation
- I'm glad we agree then. Once we are done with Iraq will will insist that the other countries you mentioned disarm od WMD
- Re: I'm glad we agree then. Once we are done with Iraq will will insist that the other countries you mentioned disarm od WMD
- I'm glad we agree then. Once we are done with Iraq will will insist that the other countries you mentioned disarm od WMD
- Re: A lot of fallacious argumentation
- Re: An essay
- the anti-war perspective
- cleaned up and de-Cr'd version of the same text
- One size doesn't fit all
- Re:
- Re: Re:
- The point of reason
- Re: Re:
- A lot of fallacious argumentation
