Re: I'm perfectly prepared for the reason for this statistic...

Current Events » in reply to Re: I'm perfectly prepared for the reason for this statistic...

Re: I'm perfectly prepared for the reason for this statistic...

alcaray — 4/24/2003 8:48:13 AM (archived)

Are they illegals and have reason (rational or otherwise) to think they will be deported if they partake?

Is the information that the care is available going out on channels that miss a certain segment?

Are the hoops a mother needs to jump through so odius a percentage gives up the quest?

Are these mothers who have a need for secrecy about personal medical conditions that they feel will be compromised?

Does it correspond to particular racial or national backgrounds?

Are they retarded or stupid?

Are there any conditions attached to the care?

why would they be that hard to discover?

If they are included in the statistics, then they have been discovered (at least enough to be able to count them). Somebody needs to detail who they are and ask them what's up, is all.

The whole thread (68 posts)

Follow Up - Perspective - 4/22/2003 9:39:03 AM
- I see the war is over now... - Fox - 4/22/2003 3:37:30 PM
  - Re: I see the war is over now... - Tom Brosz - 4/23/2003 7:29:06 PM
  - Why is a jury tainted if they have heard about a case through the press? - Scott - 4/23/2003 4:11:06 PM
    - Re: Why is a jury tainted if they have heard about a case through the press? - pwokenyaw - 4/23/2003 4:31:23 PM
      - One of Mark Twain's quotes on juries - LJ - 4/23/2003 8:06:40 AM
        
        Twain on astronomy - pwokenyaw - 4/23/2003 8:33:06 AM
- You know what bothers me? - Mary Anne - 4/22/2003 12:34:32 PM
  - Re: You know what bothers me? - Tom Brosz - 4/22/2003 4:25:21 PM
    - Re: "less than 4 percent of mothers do not receive proper prenatal care." - alcaray - 4/23/2003 3:14:43 PM
      - Unfortunatly (I guess?) we live in a country where you can't force people to take care of themselves... - Scott - 4/23/2003 4:19:20 PM
        
        Do you have anything to support your assertion... - alcaray - 4/23/2003 5:24:53 PM
        
        Re: Do you have anything to support your assertion - Tom Brosz - 4/23/2003 6:08:09 PM
        
        Face it. Some people are just to damned lazy to care. - Scott - 4/23/2003 8:54:39 AM
        
        Re: "Don't need a link. Its common sense." - alcaray - 4/23/2003 10:51:28 AM
        
        Re: Initiative - Tom Brosz - 4/23/2003 11:00:51 AM
        
        I'm perfectly prepared for the reason for this statistic... - alcaray - 4/24/2003 4:03:01 PM
        
        Re: I'm perfectly prepared for the reason for this statistic... - Tom Brosz - 4/24/2003 8:25:03 AM
        
        Re: I'm perfectly prepared for the reason for this statistic... - alcaray - 4/24/2003 8:48:13 AM
    - The war on poverty is a lot like the war on drugs. - Lee - 4/23/2003 1:13:28 PM
    - Your tax dollars at work - Fox - 4/22/2003 4:41:20 PM
  - Re: You know what bothers me? - Perspective - 4/22/2003 1:18:52 PM
    - PS-- I just notice you're still fixated on the unborn. - Mary Anne - 4/22/2003 2:45:19 PM
      - Re: PS-- I just notice you're still fixated on the unborn. - Perspective - 4/22/2003 4:58:53 PM
        
        LOLOL - Mary Anne - 4/22/2003 5:20:01 PM
        
        Re: LOLOL - Perspective - 4/23/2003 12:34:14 PM
        
        If that's the way you view it... - Mary Anne - 4/23/2003 1:28:30 PM
        
        A few points... - Tom Brosz - 4/23/2003 6:30:33 PM
        
        Oh, puleeze - Mary Anne - 4/23/2003 1:20:39 PM
        
        By the way... - Tom Brosz - 4/23/2003 6:40:28 PM
        
        PS: - Mary Anne - 4/24/2003 4:49:50 PM
        
        Consider your source - Mary Anne - 4/24/2003 4:43:57 PM
        
        You didn't notice the source, did you? - Tom Brosz - 4/25/2003 7:03:42 PM
        
        Re: Aha! found the pdf on the site - Mary Anne - 4/25/2003 12:06:16 PM
        
        Re: I'm well aware of the Alan Guttmacher Institute, thank you. - Mary Anne - 4/25/2003 11:49:10 AM
        
        Links and spin - Tom Brosz - 4/25/2003 4:17:19 PM
        
        I suppose you have interviewed many women who chose to abort. - Mary Anne - 4/25/2003 5:59:33 PM
        
        Argument premises - Tom Brosz - 4/26/2003 1:38:17 PM
        
        Re: Pregnancy - Tom Brosz - 4/23/2003 5:56:10 PM
        
        Abstinence is a good thing - Tony - 4/24/2003 7:39:35 PM
        
        Re: Abstinence is a good thing - Tom Brosz - 4/24/2003 9:15:47 AM
        
        Re: "Just because the custom is often broken, doesn't mean it's a stupid idea." - alcaray - 4/24/2003 10:14:03 AM
        
        Abstinence from low-wage jobs a good idea? Absolutely! - Mary Anne - 4/24/2003 5:44:59 PM
        
        Re: "Almost makes you think abstinence is a good idea, doesn't it?" - alcaray - 4/24/2003 5:26:12 PM
        
        Yes! THAT'S the kind of response I was looking for - Perspective - 4/23/2003 2:40:02 PM
        
        A form of birth control - Tony - 4/23/2003 3:40:39 PM
        
        Ok - Perspective - 4/23/2003 4:22:58 PM
        
        The best birth control is uglyness! (n/t) - Bill Clinton - 4/23/2003 4:20:48 PM
        
        Re: If that's the way you view it... - REB - 4/23/2003 2:32:42 PM
        
        It sounds like you assume your mother would have chosen to abort - Mary Anne - 4/23/2003 5:06:12 PM
        
        Abortion was illegal in 1966 - REB - 4/24/2003 12:37:32 PM
        
        Re: Abortion was illegal in 1966: and your point is...? - Mary Anne - 4/24/2003 4:27:15 PM
        
        Re: Abortion was illegal in 1966: and your point is...? - Perspective - 4/25/2003 3:59:35 PM
        
        Yet you forget that pre-1966 (and later) - Tony - 4/25/2003 4:14:08 PM
        
        Re: Yet you forget that pre-1966 (and later) - Perspective - 4/25/2003 4:37:19 PM
        
        Legalization - Tom Brosz - 4/25/2003 4:21:53 PM
        
        Mind reading - Tony - 4/22/2003 5:17:39 PM
        
        Re: Mind reading - Perspective - 4/23/2003 12:53:57 PM
    - Read it again - Mary Anne - 4/22/2003 2:39:02 PM
      - Re: Read it again - Perspective - 4/22/2003 3:14:17 PM
        
        Re: Read it again - Fox - 4/22/2003 4:26:09 PM
        
        -smile- - Mary Anne - 4/22/2003 4:01:10 PM
        
        Re: -smile- - Perspective - 4/22/2003 4:22:36 PM
        
        Read it again. n/t (n/t) - Mary Anne - 4/22/2003 4:32:15 PM
    - Re: 'This isn't even an abortion issue!' - D. Spires - 4/22/2003 2:29:24 PM
      - Re: 'This isn't even an abortion issue!' - Perspective - 4/22/2003 2:33:42 PM
        
        Re: The 'tragedy' is not on their agenda . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 4/23/2003 7:53:39 PM
        
        Granted, but it certainly provides a nice platform. n/t (n/t) - Perspective - 4/23/2003 9:12:17 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (68 posts)