Defining marriage as what it in fact is not intolerant.
Redefining it over the will of the people is what the left does when they know can't win by way of popular vote.
California passed a law by popular referendum defining what marriage is.
A mayor is ignoring that law and judges are refusing to have it enforced.
That is intolerant on their part.
Gay marriage is redefinintion of the word marriage like redfining Tiger as vegetarian.
It is bullshit.
This is not about tolerance for gays.
It is about the rights of a society to continue honorable traditions that have worked for millenia.
If it is to be redfined now, then let it be done as Pres. Bush proposes, with the will of the people lawfully expressed, not via manipulations and breaches of the law.
Ed
Current Events » in reply to Huge. Huge. Mistake.
What is intolerant is redefining marriage over the will of the people
The whole thread (101 posts)
- Gay marriage amendment
- The Inconvenient Question, revisited
- re: The Inconvenient Question, revisited
- OK, I'll bite
- The crux of that argument is polygamy
- First liberals had trouble with what the meaning of "is" is, now they're having trouble with the meaning of marriage.
- more to the point......
- A terrific error
- Huge. Huge. Mistake.
- What is intolerant is redefining marriage over the will of the people
- I've explained this once or twice before...
- What a coincidence!!!
- The terrible price of freedom
- Those Christians again -
- re: Those Christians
- No culture in Human history has allowed for same sex marriage.
- One explanation of the difference.
- re: If you marry someone who's of legal age in one state . . .
- re: Those Christians
- A BIG mistake.
- re: Gay marriage amendment
- re: Flap in California, or Nader's announcement . . . ?
- The Inconvenient Question, revisited
