I believe the late, great Mr. James Coburn (AKA "Our Man Flint" [1966]) was the first to be hit with that old "palamony"-thing back in the early '70s, where he was forced to give up half his possessions because he and his live-in girlfriend (women seem to hate that "girlfriend" word -- unless they're using it) split up. He mentioned, I believe on the Dinah Shore Show, that it was a messy breakup, and that he was quite surprised to find the law suite in his mail. It had never happened before, so he fought it in court -- and lost.
No civil union ceremony. No binding marriage license anywhere on record. And yet they were "looked up" by the California courts as a common law couple.
Too funny to be sad, and yet it really was.
Cheers,
Dan
Current Events » in reply to Equal protection
re: James Coburn . . .
The whole thread (101 posts)
- Gay marriage amendment
- The Inconvenient Question, revisited
- re: The Inconvenient Question, revisited
- OK, I'll bite
- The crux of that argument is polygamy
- First liberals had trouble with what the meaning of "is" is, now they're having trouble with the meaning of marriage.
- more to the point......
- A terrific error
- Huge. Huge. Mistake.
- What is intolerant is redefining marriage over the will of the people
- I've explained this once or twice before...
- What a coincidence!!!
- The terrible price of freedom
- Those Christians again -
- re: Those Christians
- No culture in Human history has allowed for same sex marriage.
- One explanation of the difference.
- re: If you marry someone who's of legal age in one state . . .
- re: Those Christians
- A BIG mistake.
- re: Gay marriage amendment
- re: Flap in California, or Nader's announcement . . . ?
- The Inconvenient Question, revisited
