But it boils down to this: Whoever actually wrote and/or delivered that mess, it's obvious that it's written for a specific audience, and that audience is NOT America. Now tell me we should take his inflammatory rhetoric as literally as some people take Pat Robertson's...
Bin Laden was responsible for the destruction of a part of New York City, another attack on our military nerve center, a thwarted attack on the Capitol, and the deaths of nearly 3,000 Americans on our home soil.
I'm really curious to know exactly what someone has to do, who says he's going to kill us if we don't do what he wants, for you to take him "literally."
To the best of my knowledge, Pat Robertson has not actually sent anyone to Hell.
And the Inquisition was a very long time ago. Islamic radicalism is here and now.
Current Events » in reply to On second thought...
Rhetoric
The whole thread (82 posts)
- The war on terror
- re: The war on terror
- Emmenthaler cheese
- Liberal for a day.
- The war on thought
- Nice Summary Tom
- A little lste now for those questions, Tom
- re: Bush's war on terror
- I'll vote for #6 and #2 (n/t)
