I did say "Usually". I did not say "Always"

Flame » in reply to Excepting the posts you respond to? [giggle]

I did say "Usually". I did not say "Always"

REB — 8/24/2006 6:27:46 PM (archived)

Maybe always ignoring would be better, thou, than usually ignoring him. Something for me to think about. You see what happened on this thread when I didn't ignore him. I sure many here wished I had ignored him.

The whole thread (70 posts)

Empathy - Bowser - 8/23/2006 6:26:22 AM
- re: Empathy - REB - 8/24/2006 1:37:56 PM
  - All people do around here is ignore questions. Are you without sin? (n/t) - alcaray - 8/24/2006 3:29:52 PM
    - Nope. I am a sinner. Didn't somebody on this thred say "I NOTICED NO, NOT ONE, CONSERVATIVE WOULD ANSWER THE QUESTION. - REB - 8/24/2006 3:41:38 PM
      - I jost thought there was irony in the fact... - alcaray - 8/24/2006 4:58:32 PM
        
        Come to think of it, I have never knowingly ignored a question that was directed specifically at me. - REB - 8/24/2006 5:20:09 PM
        
        Excepting the posts you respond to? [giggle] (n/t) - alcaray - 8/24/2006 6:24:10 PM
        
        I did say "Usually". I did not say "Always" - REB - 8/24/2006 6:27:46 PM
      - re: None of your business - Raoul - 8/24/2006 3:58:58 PM
        
        re: None of your business - Lindy - 8/24/2006 10:43:22 PM
        
        You do realize that you have just lost any shred of credibility? - Scott Evil - 8/24/2006 6:24:01 PM
        
        I think Raoul has the typical European mindset on this issue- which I can not understand. - REB - 8/24/2006 7:01:05 PM
        
        re: Arguments, nothing but good arguments - Raoul - 8/24/2006 8:24:40 PM
        
        Speaking of unanswered questions, I still have one for you. - REB - 8/24/2006 4:36:56 PM
        
        re: The Allies during WW2 were not just made of american troops - Raoul - 8/24/2006 5:38:55 PM
        
        I'm sure all those allies would have liberated Europe sooner or later without the USA's input of 250,000 dead troops. - Scott Evil - 8/24/2006 6:26:45 PM
        
        And how can a society that sufferer under a ruthless dictator, which took foreign help to conquerâ€¦ - REB - 8/24/2006 4:29:15 PM
        
        re: Saddam had NOT invaded any country since it had been contained - Raoul - 8/24/2006 5:29:17 PM
        
        re: Saddam had NOT invaded any country since it had been contained - Justice - 9/24/2006 3:45:39 PM
        
        But he had invaded two countries. - REB - 8/24/2006 5:39:24 PM
        
        re:For which he had been punished by sanctions, no fly zones, etc.. - Raoul - 8/24/2006 5:53:30 PM
        
        Yes, and he still continued to murder his own people under while the UN looked away. - REB - 8/24/2006 6:04:27 PM
        
        re: Inside a country - Raoul - 8/24/2006 6:15:28 PM
        
        The UN failed Iraq. - REB - 8/24/2006 6:28:46 PM
        
        re: the problem after the first Gulf War wasn't that the USA left Sadam in power. - Scott Evil - 8/24/2006 6:34:59 PM
        
        President Bush, in 1990, should have taken Saddam out. - REB - 8/24/2006 6:43:48 PM
        
        In hindsight, you are correct. - Scott Evil - 8/24/2006 7:05:21 PM
        
        re: In hindsight, you are correct. - REB - 8/24/2006 7:32:43 PM
        
        re:Dittos REB - Scott Evil - 8/24/2006 10:09:38 PM
        
        re: re:Dittos REB - REB - 8/25/2006 1:24:32 PM
        
        When the UN, who was sent to protect those people, failed, then it should be somebodies business. - REB - 8/24/2006 4:12:03 PM
        
        re: Hitler was invading countries, was allied to Japan and thus it became your business (n/t) - Raoul - 8/24/2006 5:18:53 PM
        
        But he really could not physically harm America. He was your problem, not ours. - REB - 8/24/2006 5:24:48 PM
        
        re: What about the V2 successors, able to cross the Atlantic Ocean? (n/t) - Raoul - 8/24/2006 5:31:04 PM
        
        They could barley make it across the English Channel, forget trying to hit a target. - REB - 8/24/2006 5:44:09 PM
        
        re: With a little time - Raoul - 8/24/2006 6:04:52 PM
        
        re: With a little time...Saddam could have been a threat - REB - 8/24/2006 6:31:30 PM
        
        re: Preemptive war - Raoul - 8/24/2006 8:00:47 PM
  - In Bowser's world. - Scott Evil - 8/24/2006 2:05:38 PM
- You don't really want to know. - SDAI-Tech1 - 8/24/2006 5:25:50 AM
  - Always good to get a postcard from planet Tech - alcaray - 8/24/2006 3:13:24 PM
  - It's an innocuous, straightforward post. Nothing complex. And y'all flunked. - Bowser - 8/24/2006 5:50:41 AM
    - Here's where you start to conflict... - SDAI-Tech1 - 8/24/2006 9:53:20 AM
      - Hello darkness my old friend... - SDAI-Tech1 - 8/26/2006 8:20:37 PM
- I NOTICE NO, NOT ONE, CONSERVATIVE WOULD ANSWER THE QUESTION. - Bowser - 8/23/2006 11:05:36 PM
- If they alledged raper and murderers are found guilty, then they will be hanged. - Scott Evil - 8/23/2006 6:18:51 PM
  - And that brings back your son, grandchildren, undos the rape? (n/t) - Bowser - 8/23/2006 7:05:15 PM
    - Yes. as does flying a plane into the World Trade Center. - Scott Evil - 8/23/2006 7:58:31 PM
- re: Empathy - Tom Brosz - 8/23/2006 7:06:34 AM
  - Empathy? - Publius - 8/23/2006 10:17:14 PM
    - You, on the other hand, do a much better job of faking rational thinking. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 8/23/2006 10:40:09 PM
  - How many Iraqis were involved in WTC? Typical dissembling. - Bowser - 8/23/2006 7:03:42 PM
    - Iraw ean't invaded to avenge the World Trade Center. That would have been uncivilized. - Scott Evil - 8/23/2006 8:00:54 PM
      - Is it neo-con season? - azstrummer - 8/23/2006 8:39:06 PM
        
        Please give a link to the Neo-con sources who have argued FOR a USA theocracy... - Scott Evil - 8/24/2006 3:41:05 PM
        
        re: Please give a link to the Neo-con sources who have argued FOR a USA theocracy... - azstrummer - 8/25/2006 6:14:03 AM
        
        "I can think of horrific things.." Good grief. Name one. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 8/23/2006 10:48:18 PM
        
        re: "I can think of horrific things.." Good grief. Name one. - azstrummer - 8/23/2006 11:28:47 PM
        
        Jumping in. - Tom Brosz - 8/24/2006 6:54:06 AM
        
        It's open season---fire away!!!!! (n/t) - Publius - 8/23/2006 10:20:36 PM
        
        Clearly, P., their cannons have no balls. They use other folks. (n/t) - Bowser - 8/24/2006 5:52:16 AM
        
        re: Clearly you enjoy licking your own. - Scott Evil - 8/24/2006 3:42:27 PM
  - You're warped - azstrummer - 8/23/2006 6:40:53 PM
    - I can't go slowly enough. It's too much work. - Tom Brosz - 8/23/2006 7:21:53 PM
      - Nice try - azstrummer - 8/23/2006 8:33:52 PM
        
        re: Nice try - Tom Brosz - 8/23/2006 10:46:30 PM
        
        Don't hold back Tom - SDAI-Tech1 - 8/24/2006 1:16:33 AM
  - "You do know that statement has absolutely no connection to what I said, right?" (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 8/23/2006 5:50:30 PM
    - Talking to yourself Tom? - FrankC - 8/23/2006 6:03:39 PM
      - Just to clarify - FrankC - 8/24/2006 3:57:34 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (70 posts)