The only way we ever would have learned about the massive UN-European scam going on was the weay we did - reading Saddam's files. The whole world prior to the invasion was "Oh give the UN a chance!" and "The UN knows what its doing!"
The truth of the matter is France, Belgium and Germany were in bed with Saddam and thwarted us at every step because of their own international criminal actions. Saddam would still be in bed with them and he would still be giving them oil and he would receive lots of Euros and technical assistance, while his people would be starving and kids malnourished.
Europe's media owns 2/3 of the publications that have been hyping defeat in Iraq since day one. They loved Clinton because Clinton was himself corrupt and was a bribable/blackmailable president.
The UN was being sung as the savior to the world when its reality is exactly the opposite. The UN does more harm than good - and has for the past fifty years. It coddles dictators, facilitates corruption between western and third world states and ensures that billions stay in a state of servitude.
The Euro -media complex buried the scandal fast and deep while shouting 'quagmire' at the top of their lungs and promoting the cause of insurgency for their own financial benefit.
Current Events » in reply to re: Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq?
Small point re: the UN
The whole thread (61 posts)
- Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq?
- re: Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq?
- re: Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq?
- Hindsight is always 20/20.
- Probably not
- The problem with conservatives....
- Yes.
- Yes.
- re: Yes.
- Yeap.
- re: excellent, but you forgot one thing:
- That's pretty much how I see it. (n/t)
- Here's where we differ
- re: The two next presidential contenders
- The next President will not have to deal with the war in Iraq.
- And a further point to consider is...
- re: And in november?
- " The American people would never have supported an invasion of a foreign nation which posed no direct threat, simply for economic or geopolitical reasons. "
- your drinking cool-aid if you think it was for those reasons.
- re: " The American people would never have supported an invasion of a foreign nation which posed no direct threat, simply for economic or geopolitical reasons. "
- The next President will not have to deal with the war in Iraq.
- Loaded question. But yes.