...is that their intellect is often too clouded by ideology to recognize when they're wrong about something. That's what happened with the Terri SChiavo debacle. It's certainly true with their support of "intelligent" design. And it's a terrific liability in the foreign policy arena.
Let's face it folks. Invading Iraq was a terribly bad idea, driven by the kind of simple-minded naive arrogance that typifies conservative ideology. The idea that we could force-feed democracy on a nation of over 22 million people with little more than 130,000 troops is just plain ludicrous. Its so inane that even the most strident Bush sycophant should have figured it out. Unfortunately, political loyalty sometimes muddles reality.
Current Events » in reply to Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq?
The problem with conservatives....
The whole thread (61 posts)
- Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq?
- re: Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq?
- re: Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq?
- Hindsight is always 20/20.
- Probably not
- The problem with conservatives....
- Yes.
- Yes.
- re: Yes.
- Yeap.
- re: excellent, but you forgot one thing:
- That's pretty much how I see it. (n/t)
- Here's where we differ
- re: The two next presidential contenders
- The next President will not have to deal with the war in Iraq.
- And a further point to consider is...
- re: And in november?
- " The American people would never have supported an invasion of a foreign nation which posed no direct threat, simply for economic or geopolitical reasons. "
- your drinking cool-aid if you think it was for those reasons.
- re: " The American people would never have supported an invasion of a foreign nation which posed no direct threat, simply for economic or geopolitical reasons. "
- The next President will not have to deal with the war in Iraq.
- Loaded question. But yes.
