like this article. Just once Tom (oops TB), I'd like to actually go to a link you cite, hit the "About" menu item on the page, and not have it come back with some conservative source. A quick google search on Stephen Hayes got me this article in one of the first hits.
We're into labels again too. You claim both the Taliban, Al Quaeda, and the Iraqi Sunnis are one and the same and yet it's obvious culturally that they differed greatly in their interpretation of their religion. It's like saying Timothy McVeigh was a practicing Methodist and labeling all American Methodists as potential domestic terrorists. (by the way, I have no clue what religion McVeigh was).
Man, you're beating a dying horse here. The name changed but the tactics certainly didn't.
Art
Current Events » in reply to What you're missing
Mr. Hayes has many detractors
The whole thread (61 posts)
- Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq?
- re: Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq?
- re: Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq?
- Hindsight is always 20/20.
- Probably not
- The problem with conservatives....
- Yes.
- Yes.
- re: Yes.
- Yeap.
- re: excellent, but you forgot one thing:
- That's pretty much how I see it. (n/t)
- Here's where we differ
- re: The two next presidential contenders
- The next President will not have to deal with the war in Iraq.
- And a further point to consider is...
- re: And in november?
- " The American people would never have supported an invasion of a foreign nation which posed no direct threat, simply for economic or geopolitical reasons. "
- your drinking cool-aid if you think it was for those reasons.
- re: " The American people would never have supported an invasion of a foreign nation which posed no direct threat, simply for economic or geopolitical reasons. "
- The next President will not have to deal with the war in Iraq.
- Loaded question. But yes.