"if I ever find out he was lying, rather than just mistaken"

Current Events » in reply to re: " The American people would never have supported an invasion of a foreign nation which posed no direct threat, simply for economic or geopolitical reasons. "

"if I ever find out he was lying, rather than just mistaken"

Lindy — 10/22/2006 11:37:01 PM (archived)

ER, you KNOW we've been conned.
We just hate to admit it.

Remember Cheney's "energy meetings" before Christmas? The list we couldn't even view? How do we know there wasn't an agreement of some type of put options on foreign oil and the support from his corporate base? After all, Haliburton and Brown & Root are re-building Iraq. I think it was a gamble. A business venture using the legitamcy of the Oval Office riding the patriotic fervor after 9/11.

It didn't HAVE to have much of a plan. Because the Devil was in the details. Secure the oil (energy). Secure the contracts (rebuilding). Provide security (US ARMY) courtesy of the taxpayers.
Bingo. Done deal.

The whole thread (61 posts)

Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq? - Buck Galaxy - 10/22/2006 6:05:26 AM
- re: Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq? - gbaikie - 10/24/2006 2:01:59 AM
- re: Conservatives: If we could do it all over again, would we still invade Iraq? - REB - 10/23/2006 7:09:29 PM
  - Small point re: the UN - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/23/2006 11:53:20 PM
    - PS - A real conspiracy for LindyJackEric et al - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/24/2006 12:08:48 AM
      - Like we are still itching for the Shah? (n/t) - alcaray - 10/24/2006 3:27:53 PM
      - Reveal away, Tecker - Lindy - 10/24/2006 3:05:09 AM
        
        Palmetto bugs - ER - 10/24/2006 1:11:55 PM
  - Another myth that needs addressing - TB - 10/23/2006 7:41:45 PM
    - re: Another myth that needs addressing - REB - 10/23/2006 7:45:56 PM
      - Local support - TB - 10/23/2006 8:27:33 PM
- Hindsight is always 20/20. - Scott Evil - 10/23/2006 1:43:50 PM
- Probably not - FrankC - 10/22/2006 10:18:40 PM
  - Not bad. (n/t) - Bowser - 10/22/2006 11:01:20 PM
  - Gawd that's heavy Frank..... - Lindy - 10/22/2006 10:54:53 PM
    - don't read too much into it - FrankC - 10/23/2006 12:17:25 AM
- The problem with conservatives.... - Donald - 10/22/2006 3:58:42 PM
  - their intellect is often too clouded by ideology to recognize when they're wrong about something. - FrankC - 10/22/2006 10:25:32 PM
- Yes. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/22/2006 3:51:20 PM
- Yes. - ER - 10/22/2006 12:30:26 PM
  - re: Yes. - gbaikie - 10/25/2006 2:31:27 AM
  - Yeap. - Scott Evil - 10/23/2006 1:47:53 PM
  - re: excellent, but you forgot one thing: - podrock - 10/23/2006 4:07:46 AM
  - That's pretty much how I see it. (n/t) - FrankC - 10/22/2006 10:22:49 PM
  - Here's where we differ - azstrummer - 10/22/2006 5:38:04 PM
    - "Secular Saddam" - TB - 10/23/2006 6:58:56 PM
      - re: "Secular Saddam" - azstrummer - 10/23/2006 10:12:14 PM
        
        What you're missing - TB - 10/24/2006 1:02:43 AM
        
        Mr. Hayes has many detractors - azstrummer - 10/24/2006 8:48:41 PM
        
        I dare say he does. - TB - 10/24/2006 10:04:51 PM
        
        re: I dare say he does. - azstrummer - 10/24/2006 11:21:55 PM
    - Thank you Art - Lindy - 10/22/2006 11:11:48 PM
      - re: Thank you Art - azstrummer - 10/23/2006 1:15:55 PM
    - necessary but not sufficient - ER - 10/22/2006 7:00:40 PM
      - Reverse engineering - Lindy - 10/22/2006 11:18:52 PM
  - re: The two next presidential contenders - Raoul - 10/22/2006 3:21:41 PM
    - The next President will not have to deal with the war in Iraq. - ER - 10/22/2006 4:38:09 PM
      - And a further point to consider is... - Publius - 10/23/2006 7:19:25 PM
      - re: And in november? - Raoul - 10/22/2006 6:43:50 PM
        
        re: And in november? - ER - 10/22/2006 7:11:47 PM
      - " The American people would never have supported an invasion of a foreign nation which posed no direct threat, simply for economic or geopolitical reasons. " - Laurie Street - 10/22/2006 6:34:55 PM
        
        your drinking cool-aid if you think it was for those reasons. - Scott Evil - 10/23/2006 2:01:39 PM
        
        re: " The American people would never have supported an invasion of a foreign nation which posed no direct threat, simply for economic or geopolitical reasons. " - ER - 10/22/2006 7:28:37 PM
        
        Lying or mistaken - TB - 10/23/2006 7:18:50 PM
        
        "if I ever find out he was lying, rather than just mistaken" - Lindy - 10/22/2006 11:37:01 PM
        
        We have no proof that's what happened... - ER - 10/23/2006 12:06:18 AM
        
        "That's exactly how these men think" - Lindy - 10/23/2006 12:43:09 AM
        
        Belief - Raoul - 10/22/2006 9:12:56 PM
        
        "After WW2 and the building of the EU, patriotism lost most of its appeal, over here." - TB - 10/23/2006 7:26:34 PM
        
        re: The claim of patriotism - Raoul - 10/23/2006 7:38:48 PM
        
        I can only guess... - FrankC - 10/23/2006 8:08:32 PM
        
        "There was once great patriotism for ones native State but the Civil War ended that for the most part." - REB - 10/23/2006 8:13:57 PM
        
        re: The claim of patriotism - TB - 10/23/2006 8:04:35 PM
        
        And that's the bottomline isn't it? - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/23/2006 11:39:20 PM
        
        C'est vrai (n/t) - ER - 10/22/2006 10:02:30 PM
- Loaded question. But yes. - TB - 10/22/2006 8:55:54 AM
  - re: What Saddam did in his country was NONE of any other country's business - Raoul - 10/22/2006 10:22:40 AM
    - re: What Saddam did in his country was NONE of any other country's business - REB - 10/23/2006 7:56:15 PM
    - Perhaps you can find this movie in your country? - Lindy - 10/23/2006 12:40:56 AM
      - TV Coverage in your country - Lindy - 10/23/2006 1:07:37 AM
        
        re: Thanks Lindy...but I don't have BeTV; I'll wait for another opportunity (n/t) - Raoul - 10/23/2006 5:35:33 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (61 posts)