I don't know if this is very convincing. The cosmic ray flux is relatively constant, and if it is indeed modulated by solar activity, one would expect to see the effects blamed on solar activity, i.e., the alleged effects on climate would have been identified with known solar cycles. In other words, even though cosmic rays may be causing the climate to change, the solar activity is the driver that would have been blamed for it, even if it was only a secondary cause.
This popular account doesn't go into the details very thoroughly, and perhaps I'm missing something, but any correlation with solar activity and climate should have been apparent long before cosmic rays were identified as the underlying cause. The evidence so far is indeed tenuous.
Space/Science » in reply to Cosmic Rays & Climate Change
re: Cosmic Rays & Climate Change
The whole thread (72 posts)
- Cosmic Rays & Climate Change
- Could Gamma radiation be used to destroy the chemical bonds between C & O2?
- Do we need a new board?
- re: I wonder if they looked at the Earth's atmosphere for Gamma rays.
- re: I wonder if they looked at the Earth's atmosphere for Gamma rays.
- The article you linked to gave the probable cause (n/t)
- Saw that coming a parsec off... (n/t)
- re: Cosmic Rays & Climate Change
- re: Cosmic Rays & Climate Change
- re: Cosmic Rays & Climate Change
- Taking the rays
- re: Taking the rays
- The dying Earth
- It's polar wander paths you need to be looking for.
- There is no evidence for significant slowing of the earth's rotatio, other than from tides
- re: The dying Earth
- Yes, but we can't do anything about what's going on out there. (n/t)
- The dying Earth
- re: Taking the rays
- Taking the rays
