Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to re: CO2 and global warming

What CO2?
ER — (archived)

That may all be true, but what's it got to do with the research this thread is discussing? I never even mentioned CO2, and my comments about the research Phil brought up were a highly qualified and very gentle criticism of something the news report about the monograph didn't cover: how does the sun affect cosmic ray flux, and how do we know it?

You and Mr Gbaike seem to have taken my comments as a pre-emptive strike on an alternative to CO2 warming, a mechanism you both seem desperate to preserve, before it was attacked and even before it was presented. This reveals a lot more about your feelings about what the truth should be than just what the truth is.

Your final comments, implying those who disagree with you are part of some Luddite conspiracy, does your cause more harm than good. And it is a cause, isn't it? Not just an opinion.

To be honest, the scientific aspect of this thread that really interests me is the nature of cosmic rays. This endless bickering about global warming is just annoying.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (72 posts)