As yet, while I have seen plenty of evidence over the past 500,000 year record that CO2 and temperature are related, nobody has yet convinced me which is cause and which is effect. At these time scales, the curves match too closely and there's too much error.
I can think of a lot of mechanisms, mostly astronomical, that might make temperature changes on a regular cycle. I can't think of many that would do the same for CO2 levels.
I will concede that on the up end of a cycle, there is probably some greenhouse feedback, but obviously it isn't a runaway feedback, since the cycles all end up going back down again.
I don't think anybody is claiming that CO2 has "nothing" to do with temperature, but how much is due to it is an important question, before we decide to turn over industrial civilization to those who have never had a warm place in their hearts for it.
Space/Science » in reply to It must be desperately important to you that CO2 not have anything to to do with global warming, isn't it?
re: CO2 and global warming
The whole thread (72 posts)
- Cosmic Rays & Climate Change
- Could Gamma radiation be used to destroy the chemical bonds between C & O2?
- Do we need a new board?
- re: I wonder if they looked at the Earth's atmosphere for Gamma rays.
- re: I wonder if they looked at the Earth's atmosphere for Gamma rays.
- The article you linked to gave the probable cause (n/t)
- Saw that coming a parsec off... (n/t)
- re: Cosmic Rays & Climate Change
- re: Cosmic Rays & Climate Change
- re: Cosmic Rays & Climate Change
- Taking the rays
- re: Taking the rays
- The dying Earth
- It's polar wander paths you need to be looking for.
- There is no evidence for significant slowing of the earth's rotatio, other than from tides
- re: The dying Earth
- Yes, but we can't do anything about what's going on out there. (n/t)
- The dying Earth
- re: Taking the rays
- Taking the rays
