Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to re: Murder?...yes, unfortunately

re: Murder?...yes, unfortunately
Davin L — (archived)

"because they would never willingly exercise abstinence. "

just try to prove that. Try following up on
this

And if you can find any publications or data supporting your claim
here, I'd gladly discuss it with your.

But I find your pronouncement bullshit until you have some daya that actually contradicts what I know to be true on this topic.

Frankly, I could spam links all day- but in my experience the very fact that you made such a rediculous claim means your probably getting your data from the Christian Family Council or some other nonesense group that publishes trash analyses just to give themselves data to cite. So this is likely a lost cause- but what the hell, Im the king of those. I'll be your dance partner if you want to get into this. Just bring your damn links or don't bother.

"Amen to that - very well said! The many and varied choices available today for birth control, before and after the fact, leave absollutely no excuses whatsoever any more for the murder of innocents. (The issue of rape or illness of the mother, etc. is a separate valid issue.) I have never believed that for women to "have control" over their bodies they have to kill their babies. There are better more worthy kinds of control, of which self-control is one."

And you often don't know your one of the 1% of women for whom the pill does not work until you are actually pregant. So if you grant unwanted pregnancy from rape as being a different case, what about the failure of resonable attempts at birthcontrol?

Davin L.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (65 posts)