Just wondering
"Sullivans advocate stance on homosexuality is also a quiet condemnation and attack on heterosexuality"
How so?
From what I've seen, gays are struggling for acceptance. Do you think attacking the sexuality of the other 92% of the population is a logical means to gain this acceptance?
It looks to me like you see homosexuality as a threat and thus equate any advocacy of the "lifestyle" as an attack on your values.
No?
