"So that's all you've got? I notice you failed to answer the question as well."
Well, normally I don't feel compelled to answer a posters question.
I just thought it was strange that you didn't consider grounding the entire civilian air transport as an "extraordinary measure".
But as for "the question", was this the question you wanted answered?
"Where exactly would the loyalties of our remaining Bush administration supporters fall? "
Or I'm supposed to answer some of the "questions" you had about Tom or neo-cons in general?
If your question had to do with those loyal to Bush, I don't this is very significant aspect. The reason Bush was re-elected wasn't due to personal loyalty to Bush- rather it's more the poor performance of Kerry. And loyalty has nothing to do with the position of most of the Republicans currently running for president. And it certainty doesn't affect Clinton's general political stance on the war.
Flame » in reply to Grounding flights
re: Grounding flights
The whole thread (90 posts)
- A new challenge to supporters of this administration
- Breaking News....You could be RIGHT!
- hey we have an imperial congress...And term limits for them is seen as out of the question...
- Everything old is new again
- re: A new challenge to supporters of this administration
- Interesting development
- Do you think it would help the stock market? (n/t)
- paranoia may destroy ya (n/t)
- Metaphorically speaking of course
- I am not a fervent supporter
- re: A new challenge to supporters of this administration
- It is early morning...
- re: A new challenge
