...In the same direction as the "Alternative to War" question.
Find me any major policy issue from the mainstream environmental movement for which their recommended solution is NOT a massive increase in centralized government control, either on a national or international basis.
Here's a helpful list to get you started:
Greenpeace. Friends of the Earth. The Green Party. Sierra Club. WWF. Oh, heck, here's a whole shitload of them, with web connections.
Surely there must be just one example in all this where a policy position advocating less government power over the individual might lurk.
And hey, now that you bring it up, find a person in a leadership position in the modern environmental movement that is not a leftist. And a radical one at that.
I don't give a rat's ass about the rank and file, and the folks who return their little Greenpeace envelope with a check every year. They aren't calling the shots in the seats of government.
Current Events » in reply to Re: More 'n You, Tom
I can see where this is heading...
The whole thread (73 posts)
- A site I like
- Taking one at a time...
- I love joke sites too. Thanks for the laughs. n/t (n/t)
- I suppose you would.
- thanks
- Re: thanks
- thanks again...
- The statement 'when all resources run out' is null
- Monetized resources are not a problem in a market economy
- Re: When resources run out
- I think you know the answer as well as the rest of us. (n/t) (n/t)
- Re: thanks
- Re: thanks
