Current Events » in reply to We violate the law in order to preserve it.

The whole thread (54 posts)

• Old Warhorse's Opinion - alcaray - 9/5/2003 5:38:48 PM
  • re: Old Warhorse's Opinion - Mark Eby - 9/6/2003 4:48:28 AM
    • You mis-state my position - alcaray - 9/6/2003 10:51:46 PM
      • Maybe, Maybe Not - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 1:49:24 AM
    • Uh Mary-Anne The American Justice System Doesn't Have Jurisdiction Over Iraq - Mark Eby - 9/6/2003 3:00:34 PM
      • If you don't mean a thing, then don't use the language - Mary Anne - 9/6/2003 4:51:00 PM
        • I Do Mean It And You're Missing The Point - Mark Eby - 9/6/2003 5:08:57 PM
          • We violate the law in order to preserve it. - Mary Anne - 9/6/2003 11:58:34 PM
            • PS International Law Is Not Law If It's Not Enforced (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 1:09:07 AM
              • Law is always law whether it's enforced or not. - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 3:29:14 AM
                • Apply It To Yourself - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 9:44:38 PM
                  • Invasion was agreed upon? - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 11:29:06 PM
                    • Tom Please Quote Here The Final Resolution and Others Applicable. I Bet You Have The Links Handy - Mark Eby - 9/8/2003 1:39:48 AM
                      • Resolution and Others Applicable - Tom Brosz - 9/8/2003 10:24:35 PM
                        • Password, please - Mary Anne - 9/9/2003 3:49:38 AM
                          • Sorry... - Tom Brosz - 9/10/2003 11:56:40 PM
            • No. Iraq Violated It's Obligations - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 1:03:33 AM
              • re: Did it? - Raoul - 9/7/2003 7:36:59 PM
                • Yes - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 9:26:05 PM
                  • re: consequences - Raoul - 9/8/2003 7:13:23 PM
                    • Then Explain This - Mark Eby - 9/9/2003 3:57:40 AM
              • Ah, yet another version of why we are allowed to invade other countries - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 3:19:01 AM
                • My Reasons Are The Same As They've Always Been - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 5:13:10 AM
                • Correction - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 4:10:09 AM
    • Suspects' rights vs. protecting the innocent - Mary Anne - 9/6/2003 12:12:43 PM
      • re: Suspects' rights vs. protecting the innocent - gbaikie - 9/6/2003 10:31:22 PM
        • "Similarly, Saddam was required not to have WMD" - Mary Anne - 9/6/2003 11:52:54 PM
          • re: "Similarly, Saddam was required not to have WMD" & To Demonstrate It - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 1:08:03 AM
            • A Primer - Fox - 9/7/2003 5:59:55 AM
              • re: A Primer - Davin L. - 10/31/2003 10:09:41 PM
              • Your Primer Left Out The Same Facts As Don Sooo Convenient - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 9:37:32 PM
                • "Tyrant enabling excuses"? - Fox - 9/7/2003 11:29:43 PM
                  • Somewhat Accurate - Mark Eby - 9/8/2003 1:44:16 AM
                    • Nolo Contendre - Fox - 9/8/2003 7:53:55 PM
                      • Fair Enough - Mark Eby - 9/9/2003 3:36:16 AM
            • re: "Similarly, Saddam was required not to have WMD" & To Demonstrate It - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 4:01:37 AM
              • re: "Similarly, Saddam was required not to have WMD" & To Demonstrate It - gbaikie - 9/7/2003 6:27:12 AM
              • re: "Similarly, Saddam was required not to have WMD" & To Demonstrate It - Tom Brosz - 9/7/2003 4:50:17 AM
                • Burning down the house - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 3:04:18 PM
                  • re: Burning down the house - gbaikie - 9/7/2003 9:52:54 PM
                  • He Never Fully Cooperated Mary-Anne (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 9:41:34 PM
  • Speech - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2003 9:56:08 PM
    • re: Speech - alcaray - 9/5/2003 10:28:51 PM
  • "we're in danger of failing" - FrankC - 9/5/2003 9:23:37 PM
  • And the answer is - Robert - 9/5/2003 5:52:00 PM
    • ruinous - FrankC - 9/5/2003 9:13:52 PM
      • re: ruinous - Robert - 9/5/2003 10:39:13 PM
      • And you blame us for making moral equivalence arguements? (n/t) - alcaray - 9/5/2003 9:29:35 PM
        • That's a cop out - FrankC - 9/5/2003 9:39:26 PM
          • Quite so! - alcaray - 9/5/2003 10:13:22 PM
            • re: Quite so! - Greg - 9/6/2003 2:43:27 AM
      • re: ruinous - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2003 9:26:18 PM
    • Oh, please Robert....will you STOP already?? - Lindy - 9/5/2003 6:47:17 PM
      • re: Oh, please Robert....will you STOP already?? - maleek jackson - 10/30/2003 10:51:00 PM