No. Iraq Violated It's Obligations

Current Events » in reply to We violate the law in order to preserve it.

No. Iraq Violated It's Obligations

Mark Eby — 9/7/2003 1:03:33 AM (archived)

The insistance that the US violated international law because it would not allow France and Russia to continue undermining and weakening the sanctions Iraq agreed to, to halt GW1 is wrong. You violate a truce agreement the other party is entitled to continue hostilities.

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (54 posts)

Old Warhorse's Opinion - alcaray - 9/5/2003 5:38:48 PM
- re: Old Warhorse's Opinion - Mark Eby - 9/6/2003 4:48:28 AM
  - You mis-state my position - alcaray - 9/6/2003 10:51:46 PM
    - Maybe, Maybe Not - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 1:49:24 AM
  - Uh Mary-Anne The American Justice System Doesn't Have Jurisdiction Over Iraq - Mark Eby - 9/6/2003 3:00:34 PM
    - If you don't mean a thing, then don't use the language - Mary Anne - 9/6/2003 4:51:00 PM
      - I Do Mean It And You're Missing The Point - Mark Eby - 9/6/2003 5:08:57 PM
        
        We violate the law in order to preserve it. - Mary Anne - 9/6/2003 11:58:34 PM
        
        PS International Law Is Not Law If It's Not Enforced (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 1:09:07 AM
        
        Law is always law whether it's enforced or not. - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 3:29:14 AM
        
        Apply It To Yourself - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 9:44:38 PM
        
        Invasion was agreed upon? - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 11:29:06 PM
        
        Tom Please Quote Here The Final Resolution and Others Applicable. I Bet You Have The Links Handy - Mark Eby - 9/8/2003 1:39:48 AM
        
        Resolution and Others Applicable - Tom Brosz - 9/8/2003 10:24:35 PM
        
        Password, please - Mary Anne - 9/9/2003 3:49:38 AM
        
        Sorry... - Tom Brosz - 9/10/2003 11:56:40 PM
        
        No. Iraq Violated It's Obligations - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 1:03:33 AM
        
        re: Did it? - Raoul - 9/7/2003 7:36:59 PM
        
        Yes - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 9:26:05 PM
        
        re: consequences - Raoul - 9/8/2003 7:13:23 PM
        
        Then Explain This - Mark Eby - 9/9/2003 3:57:40 AM
        
        Ah, yet another version of why we are allowed to invade other countries - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 3:19:01 AM
        
        My Reasons Are The Same As They've Always Been - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 5:13:10 AM
        
        Correction - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 4:10:09 AM
  - Suspects' rights vs. protecting the innocent - Mary Anne - 9/6/2003 12:12:43 PM
    - re: Suspects' rights vs. protecting the innocent - gbaikie - 9/6/2003 10:31:22 PM
      - "Similarly, Saddam was required not to have WMD" - Mary Anne - 9/6/2003 11:52:54 PM
        
        re: "Similarly, Saddam was required not to have WMD" & To Demonstrate It - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 1:08:03 AM
        
        A Primer - Fox - 9/7/2003 5:59:55 AM
        
        re: A Primer - Davin L. - 10/31/2003 10:09:41 PM
        
        Your Primer Left Out The Same Facts As Don Sooo Convenient - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 9:37:32 PM
        
        "Tyrant enabling excuses"? - Fox - 9/7/2003 11:29:43 PM
        
        Somewhat Accurate - Mark Eby - 9/8/2003 1:44:16 AM
        
        Nolo Contendre - Fox - 9/8/2003 7:53:55 PM
        
        Fair Enough - Mark Eby - 9/9/2003 3:36:16 AM
        
        re: "Similarly, Saddam was required not to have WMD" & To Demonstrate It - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 4:01:37 AM
        
        re: "Similarly, Saddam was required not to have WMD" & To Demonstrate It - gbaikie - 9/7/2003 6:27:12 AM
        
        re: "Similarly, Saddam was required not to have WMD" & To Demonstrate It - Tom Brosz - 9/7/2003 4:50:17 AM
        
        Burning down the house - Mary Anne - 9/7/2003 3:04:18 PM
        
        re: Burning down the house - gbaikie - 9/7/2003 9:52:54 PM
        
        He Never Fully Cooperated Mary-Anne (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/7/2003 9:41:34 PM
- Speech - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2003 9:56:08 PM
  - re: Speech - alcaray - 9/5/2003 10:28:51 PM
- "we're in danger of failing" - FrankC - 9/5/2003 9:23:37 PM
- And the answer is - Robert - 9/5/2003 5:52:00 PM
  - ruinous - FrankC - 9/5/2003 9:13:52 PM
    - re: ruinous - Robert - 9/5/2003 10:39:13 PM
    - And you blame us for making moral equivalence arguements? (n/t) - alcaray - 9/5/2003 9:29:35 PM
      - That's a cop out - FrankC - 9/5/2003 9:39:26 PM
        
        Quite so! - alcaray - 9/5/2003 10:13:22 PM
        
        re: Quite so! - Greg - 9/6/2003 2:43:27 AM
    - re: ruinous - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2003 9:26:18 PM
  - Oh, please Robert....will you STOP already?? - Lindy - 9/5/2003 6:47:17 PM
    - re: Oh, please Robert....will you STOP already?? - maleek jackson - 10/30/2003 10:51:00 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (54 posts)