My principle after 9/11/2001

Flame » in reply to Does anyone here have basic principles?

My principle after 9/11/2001

Scott Evil — 10/13/2003 5:25:24 PM (archived)

A strong offense equals a strong defense.

Either you are with US, or you are against US.

If you're against US, either put up or shut up.

If you are against US, of course you won't shut up, because you will whine and cry like the loser that you are. So if you are against US, I don't care about your opinion you are irrelevant.

Hope that helps you unnderstand where I'm coming from.

Scott Evil

The whole thread (117 posts)

Does anyone here have basic principles? - Buster - 10/13/2003 1:45:50 PM
- Libertarian principles - Tom Brosz - 10/24/2003 5:12:28 PM
  - Doncha just hate it - Tony - 10/24/2003 9:25:37 PM
    - Not really surprised... - Tom Brosz - 10/25/2003 1:13:18 AM
      - Hey!! I LIKE Kool-Aid! - Mary Anne - 10/25/2003 1:32:56 AM
        
        re: Hey!! I LIKE Kool-Aid! (n/t) - koako - 11/18/2003 6:05:26 PM
        
        re: Hey!! I LIKE Kool-Aid! (n/t) - koako - 11/18/2003 6:05:11 PM
        
        re: Hey!! I LIKE Kool-Aid! (n/t) - koako - 11/18/2003 6:04:56 PM
        
        re: Hey!! I LIKE Kool-Aid! (n/t) - koako - 11/18/2003 6:04:41 PM
        
        re: Hey!! I LIKE Kool-Aid! (n/t) - koako - 11/18/2003 6:04:26 PM
        
        re: Hey!! I LIKE Kool-Aid! (n/t) - koako - 11/18/2003 6:03:50 PM
        
        re: Hey!! I LIKE Kool-Aid! (n/t) - koako - 11/18/2003 6:03:32 PM
        
        re: Hey!! I LIKE Kool-Aid! (n/t) - koako - 11/18/2003 6:03:17 PM
        
        They're giving it away in Jonestown, look for The People's Temple - SteveS - 11/19/2003 2:07:57 AM
        
        OK? I LIKE KOOL-AID!! its not kool to have aids o ya and have you every thoaght a purple omlete to sing?? - Rockie Munky - 11/14/2003 7:02:44 PM
- Lot's of argueing, few principles. - Buster - 10/20/2003 10:29:58 PM
  - re: Lot's of argueing, few principles. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/23/2003 4:26:24 AM
    - two wrongs don't make a right - Buster - 10/23/2003 7:42:22 PM
      - You didn't read closely enough... - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/23/2003 9:52:20 PM
        
        course I didn't read closely - Buster - 10/23/2003 9:58:22 PM
        
        I have stock in Bristol-Meyer... - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/23/2003 10:07:06 PM
      - Robert's feedback - Mary Anne - 10/23/2003 9:07:12 PM
        
        Wrong feedback - Buster - 10/23/2003 9:56:02 PM
  - Geez, I would have thought mine were obvious... - Tom Brosz - 10/21/2003 12:11:20 AM
    - Sorry generic labels don't cut it - Buster - 10/21/2003 12:54:22 AM
      - Read Ayn Rand, then. Why do I need to bust my butt repeating it all? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/21/2003 3:59:24 AM
        
        Read 2 Ayn Rand books once a long time ago. All I strongly remember was they both sucked - Buster - 10/21/2003 4:16:23 AM
        
        Cliff's Notes version: - Tom Brosz - 10/21/2003 7:57:23 AM
        
        Good approach - bad books - Buster - 10/21/2003 10:06:37 PM
        
        re: Good approach - bad books - Luis F** - 12/23/2003 9:18:15 PM
        
        re: Good approach - bad books - Luis F** - 12/23/2003 8:56:54 PM
        
        re: Good approach - bad books - Tom Brosz - 10/21/2003 10:40:31 PM
- Good Job. n/t (n/t) - Todd - 10/20/2003 1:24:22 AM
- Do you? What are they? - Mary Anne - 10/17/2003 3:24:59 AM
  - I'm trying to get people to think for a change - Buster Socrates - 10/17/2003 1:06:43 PM
    - -grin- Fair enough! - Mary Anne - 10/17/2003 1:10:26 PM
      - what are you waiting for? - Buster - 10/21/2003 1:05:40 AM
        
        Still thinking about the question. - Mary Anne - 10/21/2003 1:21:43 PM
        
        pretty please no poems - Buster - 10/21/2003 10:58:07 PM
        
        re: pretty please no poems - Mana'olana - 12/13/2003 7:31:24 AM
        
        LOL -- aw, why not? - Mary Anne - 10/21/2003 11:45:32 PM
        
        Not bad. - Tom Brosz - 10/22/2003 12:05:38 AM
        
        You're both on the left... - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/21/2003 1:14:57 AM
        
        Whoosh right over my head - Buster - 10/21/2003 1:30:01 AM
        
        re: Whoosh right over my head - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/21/2003 2:23:03 AM
        
        To clarify... - Fox - 10/23/2003 2:26:20 PM
        
        re: To clarify... - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/25/2003 4:50:56 AM
        
        Mary Anne's belief to the contrary - Mary Anne - 10/26/2003 2:33:40 PM
        
        If we appear to be in boxes, Tech, it could be that boxes are all you have to put us in. - Mary Anne - 10/21/2003 11:27:09 PM
        
        I see the problem - Buster - 10/21/2003 4:09:38 AM
- Zen and the art of principled behavior. - Zen Man - 10/16/2003 4:23:49 AM
  - Hardly Zen - Buster - 10/20/2003 10:46:53 PM
- The inviolate sanctity of individual human beings (n/t) - Fox - 10/16/2003 2:38:31 AM
  - Unless they get in the way of your career. Then Abort them... (n/t) - Anne Leftleaner - 10/21/2003 3:48:01 PM
  - Except for their wallets (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2003 1:38:47 AM
    - "Farnham's Freehold" is fiction, Tom - Fox - 10/17/2003 5:09:59 PM
      - Fiction and facts - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2003 6:04:48 PM
        
        re: Fiction and facts - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/18/2003 10:40:27 PM
    - See "mush-headed partisan" remark, at beginning of thread. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 10/17/2003 3:26:48 AM
      - Doesn't make it any less true - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2003 7:04:35 AM
        
        You'd better hand in your Libertarian badge ;-) (n/t) - Tony - 10/17/2003 3:44:32 PM
        
        Do you use the roads? - Mary Anne - 10/17/2003 12:21:15 PM
        
        Yes, and I pay for it with gas taxes, not the income tax. - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2003 5:22:23 PM
        
        Guess again. - Mary Anne - 10/17/2003 6:37:12 PM
        
        re: Good point on the highways - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2003 11:23:41 PM
        
        I love it when the heavy-hitters step up to the plate - McFly - 10/17/2003 11:23:09 PM
        
        Me too! - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2003 11:27:07 PM
  - the do nothing principle - Buster - 10/16/2003 1:45:17 PM
    - Sophistry will get you nowhere - Fox - 10/16/2003 10:58:16 PM
      - Don't think so - Buster - 10/20/2003 10:41:00 PM
        
        To kill a Mockingbird, dude. (n/t) - Cap'n Tar - 11/24/2003 2:05:41 PM
        
        re: Don't think so - Fox - 10/21/2003 4:37:37 AM
        
        Good Answers And Point - Moving Ahead of Raoul - Buster - 10/21/2003 10:19:18 PM
        
        More - Fox - 10/24/2003 12:56:01 AM
- If you want a utopia, elect me as your Imperious Leader. (n/t) - Lee - 10/14/2003 3:24:39 AM
- re: A basic principle - Raoul - 10/13/2003 10:25:17 PM
  - Not good either - Buster - 10/14/2003 12:09:52 PM
    - re: Sorry - Raoul - 10/14/2003 10:33:12 PM
      - Sorry missed the twist on the classic - Buster - 10/16/2003 1:54:57 PM
      - re: "Fourth, if we accept the proverb, no need for a religion to tell us more." - alcaray - 10/15/2003 5:40:49 PM
        
        Depends on whether you see it as a proverb or an instruction. - Tom Brosz - 10/16/2003 1:34:22 AM
        
        re: "Fourth, if we accept the proverb, no need for a religion to tell us more." - Raoul - 10/15/2003 11:45:19 PM
      - re: Not bad, Skywatcher . . . - D. Spires - 10/15/2003 1:32:43 AM
        
        re: Not bad, Skywatcher . . . - Raoul - 10/15/2003 10:26:35 AM
        
        re: "Either you are with US, or you are against US" . . . - D. Spires - 10/15/2003 10:32:22 PM
        
        Sometimes you've got to push people's buttons to get them to take action. - Scott Evil - 10/15/2003 2:45:52 PM
        
        re: Black and white - Raoul - 10/15/2003 3:49:30 PM
        
        re: Black and white - Tom Brosz - 10/15/2003 4:40:02 PM
- Care to be more specific? - FrankC - 10/13/2003 10:20:40 PM
  - Let me rephrase - Buster - 10/14/2003 12:12:10 PM
- My principle after 9/11/2001 - Scott Evil - 10/13/2003 5:25:24 PM
  - Case in point - Buster - 10/13/2003 8:58:31 PM
  - I see where you're comming from. - et - 10/13/2003 7:06:18 PM
    - Well gee et - FrankC - 10/13/2003 10:25:46 PM
      - Yep, I understood that from the get-go. (n/t) - et - 10/14/2003 4:51:28 PM
      - Meant nto say left and right (n/t) - FrankC - 10/13/2003 10:30:00 PM
    - I care. - Scott Evil - 10/13/2003 9:04:02 PM
      - I can tell, just don't bleed all over the place. (n/t) - et - 10/14/2003 4:52:41 PM
- I think quite a few, actually, on both sides. Just my opinion. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/13/2003 5:18:28 PM
  - Look out, Tom -- the self-appointed philosophy police are after you . . . (n/t) - D. Spires - 10/16/2003 11:21:58 PM
    - You know what's interesting... - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2003 6:34:27 PM
      - No... - Mary Anne - 10/17/2003 6:48:49 PM
        
        It isn't about the money. - Tom Brosz - 10/19/2003 5:52:32 AM
        
        Love Canal - Mary Anne - 10/19/2003 10:25:34 PM
        
        project - tamara jones - 12/10/2003 7:07:22 PM
        
        re: Love Canal - Larry J - 10/20/2003 1:22:14 AM
        
        The Jungle - Mary Anne - 10/20/2003 2:32:16 AM
        
        re: The Jungle - Tom Brosz - 10/20/2003 7:05:40 AM
        
        Ignore the one below: this is the whole post. (HTML lesson: never use the "greater than" sign to mean "greater than"...) - Mary Anne - 10/20/2003 12:43:46 PM
        
        Involvement - Tom Brosz - 10/20/2003 4:32:55 PM
        
        What I was promoting - Mary Anne - 10/22/2003 12:12:14 AM
        
        re: What I was promoting - Tom Brosz - 10/22/2003 4:28:25 AM
        
        environmentalists = socialist buttmonkeys - Mary Anne - 10/20/2003 12:40:04 PM
        
        Sure you want your kids and students reading your recent titles? ;-) (n/t) - Buster - 10/21/2003 12:58:24 AM
        
        My kids are all old enough, and the ones I teach... - Mary Anne - 10/22/2003 12:36:06 AM
    - They would be related to the self-appointed patriotism police... (n/t) - Mary Anne - 10/17/2003 5:39:35 PM
  - just aren't willing to admit what they are eh? (n/t) - Buster - 10/16/2003 1:41:51 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (117 posts)