As with Tony, I also understand that its pointless with you. You are never wrong in LarryLand, and everyone else BUT you is a shill for some agenda.
"Malkin was given at most a few hours notice to debate a controversial book written by someone else, in a hostile environment"
Thats not what malkin says, but so what, fact seems not to matter here
Your crack about manhood and boo-hooing and blah blah:
You yourself have challenged other peoples manhood here, or made comparisons on the basis of military service (remember your 'Pussy' crack?). This is your problem, not mine. Trying to throw it back at me just makes you look like a kid spitting out his food. That you cling to your military credentials and that you drag them into every single thread in which you are pressed is entirely indicitive of the statements I made. Sorry, but this isn't about me.
"Are you really so dense that you can't see that?"
As I said, you are operating off distorted twisted reality and self-serving justifications. Did Mathews ask or did Mathews not ask, point blank:
Mathews: Are you saying he shot himself on purpose? Is that what you‘re saying?
Did he repeat the question over and over, asking NOT about what the book said, but about what SHE was alleging:
Mathews:"I‘m asking a simple question. Are you saying that he shot himself on purpose."
Did she at any time say "No" or indicate with a negative that she made that comment. At any time? C'mon, Larry- Your a lot of things, like I said, but not a complete idiot.
If some third party makess scurrilous accusations, and you repeat them, that does not absolve you from the responsibility of having made them. Most educated mature adults know this, Larry.
But like I said, you are absolutely complete in your conceit. And while you bristle at the accusations made against bush that have the same degree of veracity and basis in documented fact as the "Kerry Lied About The War" accusations, you will defend any one, no matter how absurd the defense, who repeats the Kerry accusations.
Davin L.
Flame » in reply to re: When presented with a clear statement of empirical fact, change the subject
Then, when people still refuse to concede a point to you when you are wrong, call them stupid
The whole thread (76 posts)
- Ok time for our HZ duel. Atomic weapons at 40 paces.
- I finally saw the interview
- Chris deserves to be bitch slapped for the way he treated Michelle Malkin
- So why didn't the bitch slap him herself?
- There are better ways to bitchslap someone nowadays.
- Malkin's attempt to imply otherwise were equally obvious.
- Did you read the Hardball transcript?
- I read it
- Complaining about the use of proper terminology is absurd
- Yes, I have. And saw the video. (n/t)
- I read it
- You should read the article Tom links to. (n/t)
- Did you read the Hardball transcript?
- Malkin's attempt to imply otherwise were equally obvious.
- Actually, Chris lied to her about why she was even there
- Another "What Mary Anne said"
- Oh, of course. Now why didn't *I* think of that?
- Since the commander of the boat on which Kerry was wounded
- Why have charges not been brought?
- Accidentally wounding yourself is not a criminal offense
- Could it be that no one really gave a damn until Kerry made it a big deal
- "Self-inflicted" is NOT the same as "shooting yourself on purpose." Why doesn't that sink in? (n/t)
- Why have charges not been brought?
- Since the commander of the boat on which Kerry was wounded
- There are better ways to bitchslap someone nowadays.
- So why didn't the bitch slap him herself?
- Chris Mathews is a pompus ass who is in love with the sound of his own voice
- The saddest part is:
- You know the answer.
