Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to Actually, Chris lied to her about why she was even there

Oh, of course. Now why didn't *I* think of that?

Go on an interview show to publicize your book, while on the air accuse a decorated veteran of the crime of shooting himself on purpose, refuse to either confirm or deny the accusation, use your own network to whimper that the host was rude to you. Real slick.

If she had said either yes or no, the interview might have continued. But she wanted to find a place where she could say she didn't say it while letting the statement stand. Chris Matthews was not interested in having his show hijacked for the purpose of committing slander. You can say that the show of temper was no way to treat a lady. I can say that slandering a public official is no way for a lady to act.

Of the two, which one can be taken to court? Hint: slander is a crime.

The video clip is here. Quicktime is needed.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (76 posts)