Right now, about 40-50% of my net worth is the value of my home (paid for) and other non-monitary assets. It isn't like I can get an income out of that unless I took out a reverse mortgage (not an option until you're over a certain age).
Still, if they're going to means test Social Security, I don't see how a fair test can be established if it isn't based on net worth (perhaps excluding a home) or perhaps on all income, not just taxable income. I still think a more likely scenario is for them to give the SS checks out with one hand and then tax it away with the other.
One problem with means testing based on retirement income is the definition of "rich." If someone had a retirement portfolio of a million dollars (excluding housing)*, I'll bet a lot of people would say that person is rich. Depending on the amount of risk you're willing to take, you can withdraw 4-6% of that amount the first year**. That's $40,000 to $60,000 a year (before taxes) - hardly rich by most standards, especially when you consider that long term care costs several thousand dollars per month***.
*A million dollar portfolio is not that hard to achieve over a working lifetime if one starts saving early and is disciplined.
**A recent Money magazine article discussed how much someone call safely withdraw from their portfolio the first year, with allowances for adjustments for inflation in subsequent years and with the goal of making the money last for 40 years. Most analysts use 4% as the safe value for the first withdrawl, but a recent analyst proposes a rate as high as 6.2%. However, to make that rate last 40 years, there was some very strict rules to follow. It needs more study. Perhaps a more reasonable percentage is 5%.
***When we first moved to Colorado Springs, my wife worked as a nurses aid at an upscale retirement home. The cost for a single room was $4000 per month or $6000 per month for a married couple. That was 19 years ago and you can bet that those prices are closer to the norm than for upscale retirement homes.
Current Events » in reply to re: As in the estate tax...
I agree about the homes
The whole thread (75 posts)
- Serious Insecurities concerning Social Security 'Reform'
- My plan to reform Social Security
- Thats actually a pretty good idea, IMO
- If it "over-funds" the system, just cut the tax rate. Simple. (n/t)
- The system is currently overfunded as it is
- Not if it is to become a VESTED system with assets backing liabilities.
- re: The system is currently overfunded as it is
- I could live with that.
- Thats actually a pretty good idea, IMO
- Not to mention the dark secret that people are only just realizing..
- The only true fix for SS
- More to the point
- re: No big secret.
- Tom hit the BS buzzer
- So the fix is to simply confiscate more and more money?
- Further, they always claim that it must get worse and worse
- Bartleby the Scrivener
- Does anyone else see the political weirdness here?
- Not my problem, Tom, that you have a propensity for strawman arguments and distorting positions you disagree with
- More on the Amazing Vanishing Social Security Crisis
- The DNC choice to take the position that after all the years of claiming there was a crisis, now there isn't one, will not hold up. (n/t)
- again
- correction, misread something Tom said
- More on the Amazing Vanishing Social Security Crisis
- Not my problem, Tom, that you have a propensity for strawman arguments and distorting positions you disagree with
- Tom hit the BS buzzer
- What Ed said.
- Very good points
- My plan to reform Social Security
