Well...
If we had put enough soldiers in Afghanistan to secure more than Kabul, the Taliban might not have made the comeback it did. The Taliban reestablished itself in a law-and-order move, because there was not enough of either.
What would Saddam have done? Pretty much what he had been doing. The Iranians wouldn't have the foothold they have in eastern Iraq. The Kurds would still have trouble.
Would bin Laden have been captured? Maybe. Would we have a democratic Afghanistan? Don't know. Afghanistan has gone its own way under a wide assortment of aspiring masters, going all the way back to Alexander the Great. The best chance was to give the Afghanis security while they still remembered how awful the Taliban was, and to give the women a chance to re-establish themselves in society. But we didn't do that. So we'll never know.
Flame » in reply to re: another interesting factoid
You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
The whole thread (111 posts)
- another interesting factoid
- You know...
- re: another interesting factoid
- You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- re: You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- Well, that was a waste of time. (n/t)
- re: another interesting factoid
- You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- Take it to another board. (n/t)
- Are There Any Intellectual Honest Liberals Left Here?
- How about "You're both wrong, because you're both dealing in absolutes" (n/t)
- After 9 Days The Count Is Still 0
- I was embarrassed for you
- Whether someone answers you is not a measure of honesty.
- The Measure Is Tacit Support For Dishonesty
- You are not going to provoke me today.
- Being somewhat smarter than fish, we've learned not to take your bait.
- The Measure Is Tacit Support For Dishonesty
- More a question of not letting an...
- re: More a question of not letting an...
- After 4 days the count is 0.
- Why golly gee Iddy Mae.....
- re: another interesting factoid
- contrast with: threat saddam 2003 site:www.habitablezone.com
- You're Lying Or Innacurate Again
