Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to I realize that showing you a bit of logic is a waste of time but what the heck

Faulty Logic Again
M.A.E. — (archived)

As I said I did not call you dishonest. There are multiple faults in your supposedly simple logic.

1) The original question was phrased in a manner asking for proof of honesty not as proof of dishonesty.

2) The count listed was an ongoing count with more time given do to the Holidays before "case closed" although you could take that phrasing as proof of dishonesty at that point. However I meant that I'd drop the issue then and consider it proof or at least strong evidence no "liberal one was willing to challenge their fellows on major falsehoods with regard to the war.

3) I already stated that there were liberals that this didn't apply to because they were not here at the relevant point in time.

In short liberal and no answer does not = dishonest. You are only tacitly supporting dishonesty if you remember the other issues being raised before the war and refuse to admit it.

So did you or did you not read the related posts? Your posts seem contradictory on this. If you didn't perhaps more reading would keep you from jumping to faulty conclusions. If you did read the posts why did you claim not to? Was this to demonstrate your honesty?

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (111 posts)