You're whole premise is that the liberation issue was raised as a cover by war promoters after the wmd issue faded. It doesn't matter whether the counter evidence to that bogus claim was found 2 seconds, 2 minutes, 2 hours, 2 days, 2 weeks, 2 months, or 2 years before the war. It wasn't until days after the war started that the wmd issue begain to look doubtful.
A primer in how not to look stupid for DL.
1) Don't make up false claims.
2) Don't make up more false claims to cover item 1 up.
3) Don't make up stupid slogans, use ROTFLMA, or start calling people names when you have nothing intelligent to say in response to being exposed on items 1 & 2.
4) Above all else don't offer proof you are making things up in the same post you make those claims.
5) Stick with your policy, it makes item 2 a lot less ikely.
Do You Enjoy Looking And Acting Stupid?
The whole thread (111 posts)
- another interesting factoid
- You know...
- re: another interesting factoid
- You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- re: You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- Well, that was a waste of time. (n/t)
- re: another interesting factoid
- You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- Take it to another board. (n/t)
- Are There Any Intellectual Honest Liberals Left Here?
- How about "You're both wrong, because you're both dealing in absolutes" (n/t)
- After 9 Days The Count Is Still 0
- I was embarrassed for you
- Whether someone answers you is not a measure of honesty.
- The Measure Is Tacit Support For Dishonesty
- You are not going to provoke me today.
- Being somewhat smarter than fish, we've learned not to take your bait.
- The Measure Is Tacit Support For Dishonesty
- More a question of not letting an...
- re: More a question of not letting an...
- After 4 days the count is 0.
- Why golly gee Iddy Mae.....
- re: another interesting factoid
- contrast with: threat saddam 2003 site:www.habitablezone.com
- You're Lying Or Innacurate Again
