over and over and over. This isn't the first time the liberalxxxx (make that antiwar alliance) mind meld has refused to call a spade a spade.
You would all have failed English if your papers were based on logic like a persons arguements were flawed because he uses definitions you can find in a dictionary or that you can protect freedom of speech by restricting select topics. Yet none of you were willing to disagree with obviously lame arguements because you wanted the same outcome; most obviously when you contradicted each other with arguements like Robert wasn't trying to restrict free speech versus Robert was right to restrict free speech on that topic. Of course, all of that pales in comparison to what certain Dumb Liars have tried lately in rewriting history to serve their purposes. The examples above are simply intellectual dishonesty of the play along/don't be critical of allies type rather than the outright lieing that has devolved from it. Bend and stretch the truth enough and it becomes less valued.
Flame » in reply to Whether someone answers you is not a measure of honesty.
The Measure Is Tacit Support For Dishonesty
The whole thread (111 posts)
- another interesting factoid
- You know...
- re: another interesting factoid
- You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- re: You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- Well, that was a waste of time. (n/t)
- re: another interesting factoid
- You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- Take it to another board. (n/t)
- Are There Any Intellectual Honest Liberals Left Here?
- How about "You're both wrong, because you're both dealing in absolutes" (n/t)
- After 9 Days The Count Is Still 0
- I was embarrassed for you
- Whether someone answers you is not a measure of honesty.
- The Measure Is Tacit Support For Dishonesty
- You are not going to provoke me today.
- Being somewhat smarter than fish, we've learned not to take your bait.
- The Measure Is Tacit Support For Dishonesty
- More a question of not letting an...
- re: More a question of not letting an...
- After 4 days the count is 0.
- Why golly gee Iddy Mae.....
- re: another interesting factoid
- contrast with: threat saddam 2003 site:www.habitablezone.com
- You're Lying Or Innacurate Again
