The US wouldn't be blamed quite as universally for the problem, though.
The U.S. and Israel have been blamed almost exclusively for all the problems of the Middle East for the past fifty years. What else is new?
We would probably not be on the outs with so many groups, including many allies, that supported us when we invaded Afghanistan. You may think that's insignificant, but I don't.
Make a list of all the major nations that supported us going into Afghanistan that did not support us when we invaded Iraq. How many do you end up with? Are the nations that condemn us loudly the same few every time?
The Iranian nuclear weapons program might also not be so intransigent, not because of Saddam (who would probably be looking for a way to get his own bomb to "balance" things, as with the Pakistani/Indian feud), but because the US would have more weight to throw around, economically, militarily, and diplomatically
The first part of your statement is a lot more significant than the latter. An eventual nuclear arms race between Saddam's Iraq and Iran would have been one likely result of leaving Iraq alone. We can already see in Iran how effective the U.N. is at stopping a nuclear weapons program. If a Democrat had been president for the past six years, no doubt Saddam would be bitch-slapping the U.N. as cheerfully as Iran is while brazenly going ahead with his own weapons programs.
As for throwing our economic weight around, this isn't working with Iran now, since other members of the U.N. are balking, and not just because we're in Iraq. Throwing our military weight around? Just how is that done? Would attacking Iran be an acceptable solution if our military wasn't in Iraq? Why?
I'm amused at the number of anti-war people who fret that we are "tied down" in Iraq so we aren't able to attack other countries.
Flame » in reply to Agreed, that the Middle East wouldn't be stable anyway.
re: Agreed, that the Middle East wouldn't be stable anyway.
The whole thread (111 posts)
- another interesting factoid
- You know...
- re: another interesting factoid
- You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- re: You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- Well, that was a waste of time. (n/t)
- re: another interesting factoid
- You want to speculate about Afghanistan?
- Take it to another board. (n/t)
- Are There Any Intellectual Honest Liberals Left Here?
- How about "You're both wrong, because you're both dealing in absolutes" (n/t)
- After 9 Days The Count Is Still 0
- I was embarrassed for you
- Whether someone answers you is not a measure of honesty.
- The Measure Is Tacit Support For Dishonesty
- You are not going to provoke me today.
- Being somewhat smarter than fish, we've learned not to take your bait.
- The Measure Is Tacit Support For Dishonesty
- More a question of not letting an...
- re: More a question of not letting an...
- After 4 days the count is 0.
- Why golly gee Iddy Mae.....
- re: another interesting factoid
- contrast with: threat saddam 2003 site:www.habitablezone.com
- You're Lying Or Innacurate Again
