And have come to that accommodation. Roman Catholics, mainstream Protestants, pretty much everyone but the real wingnuts. Most agree it's not for us to say that Darwin wasn't the Agent of a just God revealing His plan to his Children?
And that the begatting the fellow was busily calculating necessarily couldn't name all who participated (begatting being what it is and I suppose was).
I think it's arrogance of the highest order to tell God He couldn't work through evolution. And that our species is the endpoint of His Plan rather than a molecular by-product of the process leading to a endpoint of which God could be proud. One which listened and ACTED upon His Word.
Arf
Off Topic » in reply to The Christian Man's Evolution: How Darwinism and Faith Can Coexist
Most Christian religions choose not to tell God how to work.
The whole thread (69 posts)
- The Christian Man's Evolution: How Darwinism and Faith Can Coexist
- re: The Christian Man's Evolution: How Darwinism and Faith Can Coexist
- re: The Christian Man's Evolution: How Darwinism and Faith Can Coexist
- [Moved from Space]
- Well, I"ll be!
- Most Christian religions choose not to tell God how to work.
- re: The Christian Man's Evolution
- If you think that science has disproven religion, then you are as whacky as...
- Didn't it?
- I can't disprove that there is a tea kettle in orbit around Pluto.
- If you think that science has disproven religion, then you are as whacky as...
