Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to re: layers of wrong, dated from years ago

re: layers of wrong, dated from years ago
pwokenyaw — (archived)

From the same link:

"National Research Council Report

At the request of the U.S. Congress, a special "Committee on Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Past 2,000 Years" was assembled by the National Research Council's Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate. The Committee consisted of 12 scientists from different disciplines and was tasked with explaining the current scientific information on the temperature record for the past two millennia, and identifying the main areas of uncertainty, the principal methodologies used, any problems with these approaches, and how central the debate is to the state of scientific knowledge on global climate change.

The panel published its report in 2006.[28] The report agreed that there were statistical shortcomings in the MBH analysis, but concluded that they were small in effect."

Mann coauthored with 3 new authors a replication last year that removed tree proxies and still found the same effect. Also in the link. If Exxon could have falsified the reconstructions, they would have. For more reconstructions try here on page 467:

http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_Print_Ch06.pdf

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (62 posts)