re: Okay, then Greenland.

Space/Science » in reply to Okay, then Greenland.

re: Okay, then Greenland.

gbaikie — 1/9/2009 5:02:15 AM (archived)

Utube:
Jakobshavn Glacier

The whole thread (62 posts)

A warmer Finland - gbaikie - 1/6/2009 7:41:31 PM
- re: A warmer Finland - pwokenyaw - 1/6/2009 8:31:23 PM
  - re: A warmer Finland - gbaikie - 1/7/2009 12:01:31 AM
    - Obviously... - Nick Hoffman - 1/7/2009 2:10:23 AM
      - Can't stop that CO2 - Nick Hoffman - 1/8/2009 10:31:37 PM
      - The Larsen Ice Shelf - TB - 1/7/2009 6:19:39 AM
        
        "Glasser acknowledges that global warming had a major part to play in the collapse," (n/t) - pwokenyaw - 1/7/2009 7:53:04 PM
        
        Media Hype on ´Melting´ Antarctic Ignores Record Ice Growth - S - 1/7/2009 10:09:21 PM
        
        good job linking to a March report instead of current ones - pwokenyaw - 1/7/2009 10:58:14 PM
        
        It isn't just about sea ice. It's the total mass balance of Antarctica - TB - 1/8/2009 6:25:06 AM
        
        and the models say increased snowfall in the Antarctic, so no contradiction - pwokenyaw - 1/8/2009 11:58:22 PM
        
        Okay, then Greenland. - TB - 1/9/2009 2:26:59 AM
        
        It's the IPCC that counts - pwokenyaw - 1/10/2009 7:20:33 AM
        
        I guess that settles it then. - TB - 1/10/2009 6:44:04 PM
        
        never happened - pwokenyaw - 1/11/2009 7:56:45 AM
        
        re: never happened - TB - 1/11/2009 8:06:48 PM
        
        speaking of livelihoods, my bet offer is open - pwokenyaw - 1/13/2009 9:47:05 PM
        
        Based on what results? - TB - 1/14/2009 6:14:09 PM
        
        It would look a little like this, perhaps... - Nick Hoffman - 1/14/2009 10:02:14 PM
        
        or, for the REAL long-term view... - Nick Hoffman - 1/14/2009 10:08:20 PM
        
        That chart doesn't make sense. - Lee - 1/14/2009 11:58:00 PM
        
        What saved the Earth? - Nick Hoffman - 1/15/2009 4:36:29 AM
        
        re: What saved the Earth? - gbaikie - 1/15/2009 8:02:53 AM
        
        5% less insolation is still a big deal - Adam - 1/17/2009 9:44:33 PM
        
        re: 5% less insolation is still a big deal - gbaikie - 1/18/2009 12:41:32 AM
        
        Sun's core is where the action is - Adam - 1/18/2009 11:22:45 AM
        
        re: Sun's core is where the action is - gbaikie - 1/19/2009 12:17:08 AM
        
        re: Though I suppose that is what you meant. - Nick Hoffman - 1/19/2009 12:50:57 AM
        
        re: Though I suppose that is what you meant. - gbaikie - 1/19/2009 5:49:41 AM
        
        There are TWO meanings - nick hoffman - 1/19/2009 10:40:04 AM
        
        Which is the relevant one for most purposes - Adam - 1/20/2009 1:38:13 AM
        
        re: Based on what results? - pwokenyaw - 1/14/2009 9:32:19 PM
        
        re: Based on what results? - gbaikie - 1/15/2009 1:30:39 AM
        
        you're years behind the news - pwokenyaw - 1/15/2009 7:16:43 PM
        
        re: you're years behind the news - gbaikie - 1/15/2009 10:15:53 PM
        
        layers of wrong, dated from years ago - pwokenyaw - 1/16/2009 2:12:42 AM
        
        re: layers of wrong, dated from years ago - gbaikie - 1/16/2009 3:02:56 AM
        
        re: layers of wrong, dated from years ago - pwokenyaw - 1/16/2009 3:37:25 AM
        
        re: layers of wrong, dated from years ago - gbaikie - 1/16/2009 5:50:10 AM
        
        still more Zombie Lies - pwokenyaw - 1/17/2009 4:31:55 PM
        
        re: still more Zombie Lies - gbaikie - 1/18/2009 4:13:49 AM
        
        re: speaking of livelihoods, my bet offer is open - gbaikie - 1/13/2009 11:58:37 PM
        
        re: speaking of livelihoods, my bet offer is open - pwokenyaw - 1/14/2009 9:27:40 PM
        
        There is a reason it was originally named GREENLAND and not ICELAND. (n/t) - lance - 1/11/2009 3:12:45 PM
        
        yup - marketing. Look it up. (n/t) - pwokenyaw - 1/13/2009 9:45:34 PM
        
        re: Okay, then Greenland. - gbaikie - 1/9/2009 5:02:15 AM
      - re: Obviously... - gbaikie - 1/7/2009 6:02:11 AM
      - re: Obviously... - Bowser - 1/7/2009 4:44:32 AM
        
        re: Obviously... - lance - 1/7/2009 5:20:01 PM
        
        PS Read the cigarette companies strategies for denying cancer. Very similar. - Bowser - 1/7/2009 6:54:43 PM
        
        It's a weak argument - S - 1/7/2009 9:36:35 PM
        
        "They" means "all of 'em". - Bowser - 1/7/2009 6:44:53 PM
        
        Parallels True and False - S - 1/7/2009 9:48:27 PM
        
        re: Parallels True and False - lance - 1/11/2009 12:39:14 AM
        
        More of the same - S - 1/12/2009 8:21:16 PM
        
        re: More of the same - lance - 1/13/2009 6:16:53 AM
    - re: A warmer Finland - pwokenyaw - 1/7/2009 12:35:00 AM
      - re: A warmer Finland - gbaikie - 1/7/2009 1:56:32 AM
        
        re: A warmer Finland - pwokenyaw - 1/7/2009 7:55:34 PM
        
        re: A warmer Finland - gbaikie - 1/8/2009 7:17:05 PM
        
        re: A warmer Finland - pwokenyaw - 1/9/2009 12:06:15 AM
        
        re: A warmer Finland - gbaikie - 1/9/2009 1:55:30 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (62 posts)