Lets see...what would Scott post here...Hmm...

Flame » in reply to At least two missing

Lets see...what would Scott post here...Hmm...

Scott — 4/10/2003 2:25:31 PM (archived)

Having trouble fundraising there at the DNC?

Don't worry, word is that the Chineese and Arab Streets are gonna come through with big donations to the Democrats in the 2004 campaign.

Scott "True to Form" Evil

The whole thread (99 posts)

Observations - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/8/2003 2:13:54 PM
- Purging - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 7:54:58 PM
  - To a louse* - Tony - 4/9/2003 8:08:17 AM
    - Hey, we're not all illiterate... - Tom Brosz - 4/9/2003 11:15:41 AM
      - Other Burns you may have heard - Tony - 4/10/2003 1:44:40 PM
    - Re: To a louse* - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 8:15:22 AM
  - How do you spell ;-p - Tony - 4/9/2003 8:02:50 AM
- At least two missing - Tony - 4/9/2003 5:04:06 PM
  - Lets see...what would Scott post here...Hmm... - Scott - 4/10/2003 2:25:31 PM
  - Re: At least two missing - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 7:37:48 PM
  - Re: At least two missing - Larry J - 4/9/2003 6:46:30 PM
    - Lord take me now - Tony - 4/9/2003 7:07:42 PM
      - Re: Lord take me now - REB - 4/9/2003 7:27:59 PM
        
        Re: Lord take me now - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 9:12:51 AM
  - Ex-Canadian, actually :-) - McFly - 4/9/2003 6:11:34 PM
  - I guess you pegged me :) - REB - 4/9/2003 5:47:58 PM
  - For the sake of completeness - Tony - 4/9/2003 5:33:41 PM
    - Re: completeness - Fox - 4/10/2003 4:52:01 PM
    - I'll just go out in the garden now and look for some worms to eat.... n/t (n/t) - LJ - 4/9/2003 7:34:37 PM
      - Sorry LJ!!! - Tony - 4/9/2003 7:45:58 PM
        
        I forgive ya, Tony n/t (n/t) - LJ - 4/9/2003 8:46:48 AM
    - Tony, what did I ever do to you? - Lindy - 4/9/2003 7:27:00 PM
      - Well, you called me Welsh once - Tony - 4/9/2003 7:50:41 PM
        
        Welsh? I thought your were Australian! - Lindy - 4/9/2003 9:45:08 AM
        
        Re: Welsh? I thought your were Australian! - LJ - 4/9/2003 10:22:56 AM
        
        Picking on a lady? - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 8:02:32 AM
        
        Hi ho silver! - Lindy - 4/10/2003 4:02:53 PM
        
        Re: Hi ho silver! - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/11/2003 12:12:20 PM
    - Too easily incensed - FrankC - 4/9/2003 7:26:54 PM
      - LOL! - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 7:45:42 PM
    - Well, you opened the door... - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 5:44:57 PM
      - who won't defend his positions with reason etc - FrankC - 4/9/2003 7:33:38 PM
        
        Re: who won't defend his positions with reason etc - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 8:28:17 AM
      - Well, my point was.... - Tony - 4/9/2003 6:06:22 PM
        
        Just helping out a fellow liberal! - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 9:28:25 AM
        
        Worst flame ever - Tony - 4/9/2003 9:50:58 AM
        
        Thats just my inner smart-ass ;-) (n/t) - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 12:29:21 PM
    - I recommend Tony's descriptions of us for permanent archiving! - Tom Brosz - 4/9/2003 11:15:57 AM
    - Re: Sapce board - Raoul - 4/9/2003 9:32:31 AM
      - Re: Space board, I meant ; sorry(n/t) (n/t) - Raoul - 4/9/2003 9:33:32 AM
  - Parrot points - Tom Brosz - 4/9/2003 11:08:53 AM
- Sensitivity - FrankC - 4/9/2003 4:07:16 PM
- Hey, I've done it too. - alcaray - 4/9/2003 11:11:26 AM
- Patterns like this one, for example - Robert - 4/9/2003 10:06:52 AM
  - that one deserves... - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 12:43:16 PM
    - I think of flaming as an art form ;-) (n/t) (n/t) - Robert - 4/9/2003 2:13:41 PM
      - Then why use finger paints? n/t - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 4:24:23 PM
  - Re: Patterns like this one, for example - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 10:44:03 AM
    - You tell 'em Techs! - Scott - 4/10/2003 2:48:46 PM
      - "Scott" is Tech-1 in Disguise - Lindy - 4/10/2003 4:32:36 PM
        
        Thanks for the compliment... - Scott - 4/10/2003 7:31:14 PM
        
        I'm everywhere Lindy, EVERYWHERE! - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/10/2003 12:08:34 PM
    - Flames! There are flames everywhere! - Lindy - 4/9/2003 11:35:16 AM
    - Re: Patterns like this one, for example - Robert - 4/9/2003 11:26:20 AM
      - You're doing the MA duck & cover* - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 12:15:38 PM
- "Conservative Rhetoric" is right! - Lindy - 4/8/2003 6:42:43 PM
- As a "leftie" - R.L. - 4/8/2003 5:56:18 PM
  - Flame! - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 2:26:23 PM
  - as a rightnik :-) - McFly - 4/9/2003 1:43:19 PM
  - We are all closet sophists... - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/8/2003 6:10:39 PM
    - Speak for yourself, DiTech - Davin Philosopher L. - 4/9/2003 2:30:23 PM
      - Yes, and you fit the description to a tee. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 4:33:38 PM
        
        Obviously it escapes you. - Davin L. - 4/10/2003 2:16:43 PM
        
        Not at all. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/10/2003 11:55:39 AM
        
        Re: Not at all. - Davin L. - 4/11/2003 2:30:37 PM
        
        What exactly is a "sore looser?" - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/11/2003 3:11:43 PM
        
        Is that all you got left? - Davin L. - 4/11/2003 4:33:18 PM
        
        Re: Not at all. - REB - 4/11/2003 11:17:47 AM
        
        Come on Davin. I know you want to reply to my post. - REB - 4/11/2003 3:08:40 PM
        
        Ohh, okay... if it makes you happy: "Word!" - Davin L. - 4/11/2003 3:43:03 PM
        
        Re: Ohh, okay... if it makes you happy: - REB - 4/11/2003 4:51:54 PM
        
        Re: Ohh, okay... if it makes you happy: - Davin L. - 4/11/2003 6:05:50 PM
        
        Re: Ohh, okay... if it makes you happy: - REB - 4/11/2003 6:36:03 PM
        
        dear god, and you say I go-on-and-on in vain!? - Davin L. - 4/10/2003 1:32:50 PM
        
        Just serving as a finely polished mirror! ;-) n/t (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/10/2003 4:39:04 PM
- Maybe we should lighten up a bit... - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2003 5:16:41 PM
  - Limitations - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/8/2003 5:36:03 PM
    - You, You're Full of Sh*t SDAI! - Lindy - 4/8/2003 6:34:40 PM
- Don't flatter your inadequate perceptual apparatus... - Davin L. - 4/8/2003 4:17:47 PM
  - Sorry Davin - Mark Eby - 4/9/2003 2:27:21 PM
    - Re: Sorry Davin - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 2:33:04 PM
      - Re: Sorry Davin - Mark Eby - 4/9/2003 5:26:49 PM
  - Well if we want to be blunt - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/8/2003 5:23:41 PM
    - Blunt? How about Sophmoric? - Lindy - 4/9/2003 7:11:53 PM
    - Re: Well if we want to be blunt - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 2:16:46 PM
      - "A" for pedantency (nt) (n/t) - FrankC - 4/9/2003 4:13:01 PM
        
        ooooh! Witty! Creative! can I use it? (n/t) - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 5:09:32 PM
        
        Only if you look it up in a dictionary first, Davin n/t (n/t) - LJ - 4/9/2003 7:31:56 PM
        
        Could have used pedantry but I coined one instead (nt) (n/t) - FrankC - 4/9/2003 11:33:58 AM
        
        umm, so, you are teaching us new words from a learned perspective? how pedantic... ;-) (n/t) - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 12:31:17 PM
      - Davin - this may be illuminating - LJ - 4/9/2003 3:20:26 PM
        
        Updated links - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 6:54:27 PM
        
        Oh. My. God... - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 5:12:52 PM
      - A Point Of Agreement - Mark Eby - 4/9/2003 2:36:10 PM
        
        Corrected - Mark Eby - 4/9/2003 2:51:03 PM
      - ooops! correction! - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 2:23:12 PM
    - Re: Well - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2003 5:39:14 PM
      - Tom, why did you have to go and do that! - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/8/2003 6:18:11 PM
        
        Re: why - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2003 6:31:41 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (99 posts)