"Your persistance and determination to argue little points to try and score victories even when you have clearly been on the wrong side of history regarding this conflict is definitely sophistry in action."
Tech, from what I can see, you understand very little about very much- especially the knowledge of physics- which is one of your claims of deep knowledge.
You also seem to know little of history in the micro or macros sense. Its interesting that you call my position on the Iraqi war as "on the wrong side of history" when the last shot has not been fired, nor the last town has not been taken.
"Twisting in the wind around "just cause" or even here arguing about the "definition" of sophistry in a reflective defense."
Tech, just because I shoot down your BS does not mean I am 'twisting in the wind'- it means your bullshit does not fly, does not stand to reason and is factually incorrect. I am not the best logician in the world, by any means whatsoever. I am not the best Scientist or Empiricist in the world either, but I do seem good enough to argue against your thin didactic BS.
You still don't understand what a Sophist is, and it shows. The very fact that I hold your feet to the fire whenever you drop a strawman or a red herring, or whenever your arguments turn into ad hominems, or whenevey your facts dont hook-up to reality shows me as not a Sophist. Your desire to paint me as one Does, however, indicate that you are one.
Tech, since this is flame:
You are just a sore looser. You just don't like having your beliefs shown to you as false, so you make up all sorts of fairytales about BigBadDavin and BigBadLiberals and go running off into subjectivity, like any good defeated sophist.
I bet you were one of those kids who cried 'CHEATER!' whenever someone whipped you fair-and-square in a game or a sport as a child. I bet you still do it to this day.
No go off to your website about vortices and temporal waves (or whatever) and be quite while the adults speak.
Davin L.
Flame » in reply to Not at all.
Re: Not at all.
The whole thread (99 posts)
- Observations
- Purging
- At least two missing
- Lets see...what would Scott post here...Hmm...
- Re: At least two missing
- Re: At least two missing
- Ex-Canadian, actually :-)
- I guess you pegged me :)
- For the sake of completeness
- Parrot points
- Sensitivity
- Hey, I've done it too.
- Patterns like this one, for example
- "Conservative Rhetoric" is right!
- As a "leftie"
- Maybe we should lighten up a bit...
- Don't flatter your inadequate perceptual apparatus...
