ooops! correction!

Flame » in reply to Re: Well if we want to be blunt

ooops! correction!

Davin L. — 4/9/2003 2:23:12 PM (archived)

"We rarely disagree" should read
"We rarely agree!"

Sorry Tom- no offense intended to say we agree, but I was reading Ayn Rand last night... And since that prattle is just Marxism on Opposite day, I guess I just got used to stating the negation of everything.

Davin L.

The whole thread (99 posts)

Observations - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/8/2003 2:13:54 PM
- Purging - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 7:54:58 PM
  - To a louse* - Tony - 4/9/2003 8:08:17 AM
    - Hey, we're not all illiterate... - Tom Brosz - 4/9/2003 11:15:41 AM
      - Other Burns you may have heard - Tony - 4/10/2003 1:44:40 PM
    - Re: To a louse* - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 8:15:22 AM
  - How do you spell ;-p - Tony - 4/9/2003 8:02:50 AM
- At least two missing - Tony - 4/9/2003 5:04:06 PM
  - Lets see...what would Scott post here...Hmm... - Scott - 4/10/2003 2:25:31 PM
  - Re: At least two missing - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 7:37:48 PM
  - Re: At least two missing - Larry J - 4/9/2003 6:46:30 PM
    - Lord take me now - Tony - 4/9/2003 7:07:42 PM
      - Re: Lord take me now - REB - 4/9/2003 7:27:59 PM
        
        Re: Lord take me now - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 9:12:51 AM
  - Ex-Canadian, actually :-) - McFly - 4/9/2003 6:11:34 PM
  - I guess you pegged me :) - REB - 4/9/2003 5:47:58 PM
  - For the sake of completeness - Tony - 4/9/2003 5:33:41 PM
    - Re: completeness - Fox - 4/10/2003 4:52:01 PM
    - I'll just go out in the garden now and look for some worms to eat.... n/t (n/t) - LJ - 4/9/2003 7:34:37 PM
      - Sorry LJ!!! - Tony - 4/9/2003 7:45:58 PM
        
        I forgive ya, Tony n/t (n/t) - LJ - 4/9/2003 8:46:48 AM
    - Tony, what did I ever do to you? - Lindy - 4/9/2003 7:27:00 PM
      - Well, you called me Welsh once - Tony - 4/9/2003 7:50:41 PM
        
        Welsh? I thought your were Australian! - Lindy - 4/9/2003 9:45:08 AM
        
        Re: Welsh? I thought your were Australian! - LJ - 4/9/2003 10:22:56 AM
        
        Picking on a lady? - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 8:02:32 AM
        
        Hi ho silver! - Lindy - 4/10/2003 4:02:53 PM
        
        Re: Hi ho silver! - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/11/2003 12:12:20 PM
    - Too easily incensed - FrankC - 4/9/2003 7:26:54 PM
      - LOL! - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 7:45:42 PM
    - Well, you opened the door... - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 5:44:57 PM
      - who won't defend his positions with reason etc - FrankC - 4/9/2003 7:33:38 PM
        
        Re: who won't defend his positions with reason etc - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 8:28:17 AM
      - Well, my point was.... - Tony - 4/9/2003 6:06:22 PM
        
        Just helping out a fellow liberal! - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 9:28:25 AM
        
        Worst flame ever - Tony - 4/9/2003 9:50:58 AM
        
        Thats just my inner smart-ass ;-) (n/t) - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 12:29:21 PM
    - I recommend Tony's descriptions of us for permanent archiving! - Tom Brosz - 4/9/2003 11:15:57 AM
    - Re: Sapce board - Raoul - 4/9/2003 9:32:31 AM
      - Re: Space board, I meant ; sorry(n/t) (n/t) - Raoul - 4/9/2003 9:33:32 AM
  - Parrot points - Tom Brosz - 4/9/2003 11:08:53 AM
- Sensitivity - FrankC - 4/9/2003 4:07:16 PM
- Hey, I've done it too. - alcaray - 4/9/2003 11:11:26 AM
- Patterns like this one, for example - Robert - 4/9/2003 10:06:52 AM
  - that one deserves... - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 12:43:16 PM
    - I think of flaming as an art form ;-) (n/t) (n/t) - Robert - 4/9/2003 2:13:41 PM
      - Then why use finger paints? n/t - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 4:24:23 PM
  - Re: Patterns like this one, for example - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 10:44:03 AM
    - You tell 'em Techs! - Scott - 4/10/2003 2:48:46 PM
      - "Scott" is Tech-1 in Disguise - Lindy - 4/10/2003 4:32:36 PM
        
        Thanks for the compliment... - Scott - 4/10/2003 7:31:14 PM
        
        I'm everywhere Lindy, EVERYWHERE! - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/10/2003 12:08:34 PM
    - Flames! There are flames everywhere! - Lindy - 4/9/2003 11:35:16 AM
    - Re: Patterns like this one, for example - Robert - 4/9/2003 11:26:20 AM
      - You're doing the MA duck & cover* - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 12:15:38 PM
- "Conservative Rhetoric" is right! - Lindy - 4/8/2003 6:42:43 PM
- As a "leftie" - R.L. - 4/8/2003 5:56:18 PM
  - Flame! - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 2:26:23 PM
  - as a rightnik :-) - McFly - 4/9/2003 1:43:19 PM
  - We are all closet sophists... - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/8/2003 6:10:39 PM
    - Speak for yourself, DiTech - Davin Philosopher L. - 4/9/2003 2:30:23 PM
      - Yes, and you fit the description to a tee. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 4:33:38 PM
        
        Obviously it escapes you. - Davin L. - 4/10/2003 2:16:43 PM
        
        Not at all. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/10/2003 11:55:39 AM
        
        Re: Not at all. - Davin L. - 4/11/2003 2:30:37 PM
        
        What exactly is a "sore looser?" - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/11/2003 3:11:43 PM
        
        Is that all you got left? - Davin L. - 4/11/2003 4:33:18 PM
        
        Re: Not at all. - REB - 4/11/2003 11:17:47 AM
        
        Come on Davin. I know you want to reply to my post. - REB - 4/11/2003 3:08:40 PM
        
        Ohh, okay... if it makes you happy: "Word!" - Davin L. - 4/11/2003 3:43:03 PM
        
        Re: Ohh, okay... if it makes you happy: - REB - 4/11/2003 4:51:54 PM
        
        Re: Ohh, okay... if it makes you happy: - Davin L. - 4/11/2003 6:05:50 PM
        
        Re: Ohh, okay... if it makes you happy: - REB - 4/11/2003 6:36:03 PM
        
        dear god, and you say I go-on-and-on in vain!? - Davin L. - 4/10/2003 1:32:50 PM
        
        Just serving as a finely polished mirror! ;-) n/t (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/10/2003 4:39:04 PM
- Maybe we should lighten up a bit... - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2003 5:16:41 PM
  - Limitations - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/8/2003 5:36:03 PM
    - You, You're Full of Sh*t SDAI! - Lindy - 4/8/2003 6:34:40 PM
- Don't flatter your inadequate perceptual apparatus... - Davin L. - 4/8/2003 4:17:47 PM
  - Sorry Davin - Mark Eby - 4/9/2003 2:27:21 PM
    - Re: Sorry Davin - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 2:33:04 PM
      - Re: Sorry Davin - Mark Eby - 4/9/2003 5:26:49 PM
  - Well if we want to be blunt - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/8/2003 5:23:41 PM
    - Blunt? How about Sophmoric? - Lindy - 4/9/2003 7:11:53 PM
    - Re: Well if we want to be blunt - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 2:16:46 PM
      - "A" for pedantency (nt) (n/t) - FrankC - 4/9/2003 4:13:01 PM
        
        ooooh! Witty! Creative! can I use it? (n/t) - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 5:09:32 PM
        
        Only if you look it up in a dictionary first, Davin n/t (n/t) - LJ - 4/9/2003 7:31:56 PM
        
        Could have used pedantry but I coined one instead (nt) (n/t) - FrankC - 4/9/2003 11:33:58 AM
        
        umm, so, you are teaching us new words from a learned perspective? how pedantic... ;-) (n/t) - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 12:31:17 PM
      - Davin - this may be illuminating - LJ - 4/9/2003 3:20:26 PM
        
        Updated links - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2003 6:54:27 PM
        
        Oh. My. God... - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 5:12:52 PM
      - A Point Of Agreement - Mark Eby - 4/9/2003 2:36:10 PM
        
        Corrected - Mark Eby - 4/9/2003 2:51:03 PM
      - ooops! correction! - Davin L. - 4/9/2003 2:23:12 PM
    - Re: Well - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2003 5:39:14 PM
      - Tom, why did you have to go and do that! - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/8/2003 6:18:11 PM
        
        Re: why - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2003 6:31:41 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (99 posts)