Oh what the heck, I'll try and piss off everyone
Lindy - toned down contrail/UFO/unsubstantaited leftist crap, but still gets a couple of out of their gourd posts in once in a while. Inclined to believe that sky is falling with every passing development. Sees only the bad while shielding out the good.
Bowser - recently went off the deep end. I actually like him - he's put out more about himself than most on the boards. But completely flippin useless in trying to make a point, and finds it necessary to make stupid standardized "leftist" points at that.
Davin - Good debater and not easily pigeon holed. Only problem is he's a smart ass who's threads end up in Argumentation 501.
Raoul - Too willing to believe that US is wrong in all things. (But a genuinely nice guy)
Mary Anne, Robert S, Alcaray - I agree with em too much. Makes me feel kinda pointless. :-)
Too clever and articulate for me to compete with.
Fox - doesn't post enough
Me - really having a hard time trying to decide whether to quit the Zone. Once dismissed it as a "right wing think tank" and for a large part that still holds true. Too easily incensed by the lack of coherent argument from either extreme, whether it be SDAI's racism, Ed's lack of thought or Bowsers lack of point.
Who'd I miss?
Flame » in reply to At least two missing
For the sake of completeness
The whole thread (99 posts)
- Observations
- Purging
- At least two missing
- Lets see...what would Scott post here...Hmm...
- Re: At least two missing
- Re: At least two missing
- Ex-Canadian, actually :-)
- I guess you pegged me :)
- For the sake of completeness
- Parrot points
- Sensitivity
- Hey, I've done it too.
- Patterns like this one, for example
- "Conservative Rhetoric" is right!
- As a "leftie"
- Maybe we should lighten up a bit...
- Don't flatter your inadequate perceptual apparatus...
