RL you have had two people not wed to Bush's agenda telling you and other dedicated Democrats over and over that putting American security in the hands of the French, Germans, and Russians and returning to failed Clinton policies was going to irritate a lot of independents. You can stick your fingers in your ears like Chris or you can realize the Democrats better not play political games with national security next time. I wanted someone besides Bush and am sorely disappointed with the Democrats for failing to select someone strong on security that could also fix many of Bush's domestic blunders. I am furious at the dirty tricks they played this time around while whining constantly about Republican dirty tricks. The AWOL issue was total crap in the context of Clinton's history and Bush's demonstrable record as CIC. The sudden memory loss on their own Iraq WMD stances was also particularly disgusting. The Democrats will keep loosing if they keep being stupid enough to think Bush is an inept moron and listen only to their left wing while trying to push a pile of crap on the public that anyone not blinded by BDS can see through.
Regards,
Mark
Flame » in reply to Tom, I suggest you drop it...
I Suggest You Listen
The whole thread (53 posts)
- "Open Letter to the Democratic Party"
- re: What about terrorism..
- Tom, I suggest you drop it...
- 'Childish arrogance'? What press conference were you watching?
- I Suggest You Listen
- I'm not gloating. I'm showing where the problems are.
- Actual gloating would probably involve grinning like a Cheshire Cat...
- What the Democrats stood for when we were kids
- Social Security
- Democrats...
- re: Democrats...
- I see both of you having quite different definitions of these things.
- I'd take the time to respond...
- re: Democrats...
