I'm Sure You're Familiar With Exponential Growth Curves

Flame » in reply to Selecting one of your statements to eximplify why the right wing is dangerous

I'm Sure You're Familiar With Exponential Growth Curves

Mark Eby — 11/9/2004 1:53:01 AM (archived)

That seems to me to be where terrorism was headed. The GW threat seems to be linear or modestly exponential over time. I agree it has a longer term reach, but it is also far more predictable than the impacts of terrorism. I disagree that GW is the greater threat. Kerry certainly never tried to make that claim so you really don't have a basis to choose him based on your evaluation even if it was true. Clinton didn't accomplish anything significant either. This is a battle between science and public apathy not between the Democrats and Republicans.

I also think I have argued the case for global warming being a real issue a lot more often than you have RL. How about it Tom, Larry, Phil, Ed, Gary, and others - who has argued against you on this issue more? You might want to reconsider the accusation of "your party....".

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (53 posts)

"Open Letter to the Democratic Party" - Tom Brosz - 11/6/2004 9:19:57 PM
- re: What about terrorism.. - Raoul - 11/7/2004 12:44:41 AM
  - "Martyrs are Multiplying" - Lindy - 11/9/2004 4:41:22 AM
    - You want to rethink that headline? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2004 9:29:53 AM
      - No....why? Do you find it offensive? (n/t) - Lindy - 11/9/2004 3:42:17 PM
        
        Well, okay. Keep the martyrs coming! - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2004 5:41:07 PM
  - Scott Ritter predicted we would not be able to capture Baghdad in 2003. - ebnelson - 11/8/2004 3:24:03 PM
  - re: What about terrorism.. - Tom Brosz - 11/7/2004 1:43:35 AM
    - re: What about terrorism.. - Raoul - 11/7/2004 10:39:28 AM
      - When do you think Afghanistan or Iraq would ahve chosen to allow this 'new force' to operate? (n/t) - ebnelson - 11/8/2004 4:43:49 PM
      - Approval? - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 12:58:34 AM
      - Funny That Doesn't Show In Your Quote - Mark Eby - 11/7/2004 5:20:21 PM
        
        re: Translating long texts is not easy - Raoul - 11/7/2004 9:01:55 PM
    - You Don't Expect Good Advice On Winning A War From The French Do You? - Mark Eby - 11/7/2004 3:05:08 AM
      - re: The best of advice, of course - Raoul - 11/7/2004 10:28:11 AM
        
        Mental Disconnect - Mark Eby - 11/7/2004 5:14:29 PM
        
        re: Sure - Raoul - 11/7/2004 9:07:40 PM
        
        The Number On The Security Council Is Limited - Mark Eby - 11/7/2004 9:56:45 PM
- Tom, I suggest you drop it... - R.L. - 11/6/2004 11:06:14 PM
  - 'Childish arrogance'? What press conference were you watching? - ebnelson - 11/8/2004 3:26:10 PM
  - I Suggest You Listen - Mark Eby - 11/7/2004 3:17:17 AM
    - You make several good points but piss it all away with one line - Tony - 11/8/2004 4:49:37 PM
      - Keep On Plugging - Mark Eby - 11/9/2004 1:40:35 AM
        
        re: Keep On Plugging - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2004 5:51:42 PM
        
        Ah, I see. - Tony - 11/9/2004 7:05:23 PM
        
        P.S. - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2004 8:28:08 PM
        
        Sarcasm dear boy, sarcasm - Tony - 11/9/2004 8:50:23 PM
        
        Not sure I do. - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2004 8:27:13 PM
    - You know, I find it funny.... - R.L. - 11/7/2004 9:24:30 AM
      - Good Point But - Mark Eby - 11/7/2004 6:02:13 PM
        
        Selecting one of your statements to eximplify why the right wing is dangerous - R.L. - 11/8/2004 3:06:11 AM
        
        I'm Sure You're Familiar With Exponential Growth Curves - Mark Eby - 11/9/2004 1:53:01 AM
        
        re: Selecting one of your statements to eximplify why the right wing is dangerous - gbaikie - 11/8/2004 11:58:18 PM
        
        Global warming - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 7:03:22 AM
        
        re: Global warming - ebnelson - 11/8/2004 4:48:42 PM
        
        Interesting way to say that RL is right -- er, correct. - Mary Anne - 11/8/2004 1:56:28 PM
        
        re: Interesting way to say that RL is right -- er, correct. - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 4:58:49 PM
  - I'm not gloating. I'm showing where the problems are. - Tom Brosz - 11/7/2004 1:27:49 AM
    - Actual gloating would probably involve grinning like a Cheshire Cat... - Tom Brosz - 11/7/2004 7:11:55 AM
      - Yeah but the Cheshire cat disappeared... - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/8/2004 12:51:02 AM
    - What the Democrats stood for when we were kids - Mary Anne - 11/7/2004 3:26:47 AM
      - Social Security - ebnelson - 11/8/2004 4:42:23 PM
      - Democrats... - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/7/2004 4:17:20 AM
        
        re: Democrats... - Mary Anne - 11/7/2004 12:38:21 PM
        
        I see both of you having quite different definitions of these things. - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 1:38:20 AM
        
        Not that I'm commenting on US affairs, of which I know little, but I did hear something from the Old Testament: - Daniel - 11/9/2004 4:23:29 PM
        
        re: Not that I'm commenting on US affairs, of which I know little, but I did hear something from the Old Testament: - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2004 8:36:38 PM
        
        and as usual, your interpretation - Tony - 11/8/2004 5:00:15 PM
        
        Tony: I would feel a lot better about a lot of things if you or Mary Anne had been sitting next to Clinton at the convention instead of Michael Moore. - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 6:38:28 PM
        
        For the last time - Tony - 11/8/2004 7:05:29 PM
        
        Well, I guess that's the main disagreement then. - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 7:48:08 PM
        
        If the far left was driving we'd be looking at Bush 537 Kucinich 1 (from Maine) (n/t) - Tony - 11/8/2004 7:51:00 PM
        
        I'd take the time to respond... - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/8/2004 12:45:15 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (53 posts)