Interesting way to say that RL is right -- er, correct.
So the opposition is about the politics?
If that's really how it is, if some on the Right can see that the science is valid, then why is the argument from the Right not being pursued in that fashion, rather than the fingers in the ears, I can't hear you approach I read so much more often?
The Right could own this issue if it would develop a realistic alternative to Kyoto that the rest of the world could use as a negotiating platform. Of course, that would mean giving in on some points ourselves. So instead of owning the issue and looking uncooperative in the short term to their own corporate sponsors, the Right opts to disown the issue. Quarterly thinking strikes again. Too bad the planet doesn't recognize political agendas.