A ballistic missile (V-2) is an order-of-magnitude more expensive than a cruise missile (V-1). If all the money poured into V-2s had been spent on manufacturing V-1s then there might have been a different outcome to World War 2 (the V-1s caused terrible suffering for the British).
While V-2s were much more expensive than V-1s, they were also unstoppable. V-1s were fairly fast, but several fighters* could catch them and either shoot them down or tip them over**. Within a few weeks of the V-1s becoming operational, proximity fuzed antiaircraft shells started dropping them like flies. The British moved antiaircraft batteries with proximity fuzes to the coastline and had very good success at downing the buzz bombs before they crossed over into dry land. Most of those that made it through were dropped by fighters. Nothing could stop a V-2.
There was another issue with both weapons - they were launched blindly. The V-1 simply flew a straight heading for a given number of revolutions on the nose spinner (a tiny propellor used to measure distance flown), then the engine shut down and the elevator pitched it over. The Germans depended on spies to help improve their aiming. However, the British had managed to capture all of the German spies*** and had them feeding false information regarding the impact points, so the bombs became less and less accurate over time.
*The Typhoon fighter was well suited for this, and the deHavilland Meteor (Britain's first operational jet fighter) was also used against V-1s.
**Sometimes, it was unhealthy to shoot at a flying bomb. When it exploded, it could take you out, too. Some daring pilot came up with the idea of flying alongside a buzz bomb and tipping it over with his wingtip. That caused the autopilot to dump and the bomb would crash. As crazy as it sounds, it worked and was done.
***The German spies were pretty inept and were quickly captured by the British. They were offered a simple option - cooperate in feeding false information or be hung. Not too surprisingly, virtually all of them decided to cooperate.
Space/Science » in reply to Nuclear subsidy
Gotta disagree about V-1s verses V-2s
The whole thread (63 posts)
- Another vote for nuclear power
- And some more votes...
- Forget Yucca Mountain: use the former nuke test sites for radioactive waste storage!
- re: advanatge nuclear power
- Sierra Club
- I'm not convinced that nuclear fusion will reduce the amount of radioactive waste produced versus conventional fission powerplants
- Even a deuterium-tritium fusion reaction produces much less radioactive material than fission
- add: when the oil runs out, nuclear power won't keep your car running
- I had a similair voew toward Greenpeace at one time.
- I'm not convinced that nuclear fusion will reduce the amount of radioactive waste produced versus conventional fission powerplants
- Sierra Club
- We must have it...
- I'm not convinced that carbon emissions will lead to global warming
- Nuclear will still be a good idea, global warming or not.
- I'm not convinced that nuclear is a good idea
- Bio-fuels need to be pushed but the greens hate them because they still emit CO2
- re: Bio-fuels need to be pushed but the greens hate them because they still emit CO2
- Throw away your technology and return to nature!
- re: population culling.......
- Most sensible environmentalists know the difference.
- Bio-fuels need to be pushed but the greens hate them because they still emit CO2
- I'm not convinced that nuclear is a good idea
- Nuclear will still be a good idea, global warming or not.
