"this case probably reaches the bright line of when acquiring private property for a public purpose is or is not constitutional."
But the new ground is that now a PRIVATE corporation can sieze the property. Very different from a municipality making public good siezures for roads, schools, etc. The specific case resulted in more tax $ going to the local govt. What municipality can resist the temptation to oust Mom & Pop business & homes for big tax revenue projects?
The only part of the decision I agree with is that the SCOTUS left decision making to the localities, not the Federal courts. Wonder why the 180 in their behaviour relative to this issue? Normally, most everything goes to the Feds, but not in this instance. Strange.
Current Events » in reply to The power of imminent domain...
re: The power of imminent domain...
The whole thread (90 posts)
- CNN: "High court OKs personal property seizures"
- I'm hearing that there were a lot of questionable "Eminent Domain" actions that are now proceeding because of this decision.
- High Court Justices' Property at Risk
- The power of imminent domain...
- The rest of the decision:
- The gist of this decision:
- Odds are good that middle- and lower-class property owners...
- Tell that to the people in CT...
- Also, about lost income, I referred to rental income.
- no income is lost............
- Strange bedfellows
- The issue is the "uniqueness" that is inherent in each piece of real-property
- re: bedfellows
- The Supreme Court is ruling on its authority to abrogate a local law.
- Strange bedfellows
- no income is lost............
- So we can get it on the record:
- Also, about lost income, I referred to rental income.
- Tell that to the people in CT...
- Odds are good that middle- and lower-class property owners...
- Going back to the point that language has meaning and misuse leads to emotional misunderstanding..
- jWow! Scalia and Thomas came down on the side of people!!!
- Sounds like a BAD decision to me.
- re: CNN: "High court OKs personal property seizures"
