You have just explained why we have a court system. And that would be your proper recourse. In my state you are not fighting the deep pockets of government, government will foot your legal bills.
No foul, if you believe in a system of laws. This is part of the checks and balances system we vaunt, remember?
On the other hand, perhaps you feel Wal-Mart can not only effectively bribe the zoning board, the zoning appeals board, but the county or city commissioners, AND the courts as well?
Wow, I am glad I don't have to live in your neighborhood. Come to Florida, the weather is fine, the sun shines, and even Wal-Mart couldn't get away with what you fear here.
Publius
Current Events » in reply to Public good (established law) vs benefit for a private company
In the case you site.......
The whole thread (90 posts)
- CNN: "High court OKs personal property seizures"
- I'm hearing that there were a lot of questionable "Eminent Domain" actions that are now proceeding because of this decision.
- High Court Justices' Property at Risk
- The power of imminent domain...
- The rest of the decision:
- The gist of this decision:
- Odds are good that middle- and lower-class property owners...
- Tell that to the people in CT...
- Also, about lost income, I referred to rental income.
- no income is lost............
- Strange bedfellows
- The issue is the "uniqueness" that is inherent in each piece of real-property
- re: bedfellows
- The Supreme Court is ruling on its authority to abrogate a local law.
- Strange bedfellows
- no income is lost............
- So we can get it on the record:
- Also, about lost income, I referred to rental income.
- Tell that to the people in CT...
- Odds are good that middle- and lower-class property owners...
- Going back to the point that language has meaning and misuse leads to emotional misunderstanding..
- jWow! Scalia and Thomas came down on the side of people!!!
- Sounds like a BAD decision to me.
- re: CNN: "High court OKs personal property seizures"
