Sorry, Mary Anne, but you're naive. It takes either a legislative action (or, as often as not, a court decision) to change a law. More often than not, the people who win elections are the ones with the most "campaign contributions" (bribes by another name). When the people with the money (e.g. developers) donate to politicians, they expect something in return. When they covet someone else's property, all they have to do now is get the local or state government to force a takings "for the public good." The people who bought and paid for the politicians dictate the process.
It's funny that you're siding with large corporate interests against ordinary citizens who may be fortunate enough to own a desireable piece of property. You're siding with forcing people to sell against their will for the benefit of other private individuals or corporations. Maybe one day a Cosco or something similar will desire your property. If you want to sell, fine. If not, too bad, you're out of luck.
Maybe you like the idea that whatever raises revenue for government is a good thing. Many of us disagree. Since the Supreme Court has ruled yet again against the Constitution's intent, there isn't much individuals can do.
Current Events » in reply to So what do you suggest? Go to the Supreme Court with torches and axes?
Naive
The whole thread (90 posts)
- CNN: "High court OKs personal property seizures"
- I'm hearing that there were a lot of questionable "Eminent Domain" actions that are now proceeding because of this decision.
- High Court Justices' Property at Risk
- The power of imminent domain...
- The rest of the decision:
- The gist of this decision:
- Odds are good that middle- and lower-class property owners...
- Tell that to the people in CT...
- Also, about lost income, I referred to rental income.
- no income is lost............
- Strange bedfellows
- The issue is the "uniqueness" that is inherent in each piece of real-property
- re: bedfellows
- The Supreme Court is ruling on its authority to abrogate a local law.
- Strange bedfellows
- no income is lost............
- So we can get it on the record:
- Also, about lost income, I referred to rental income.
- Tell that to the people in CT...
- Odds are good that middle- and lower-class property owners...
- Going back to the point that language has meaning and misuse leads to emotional misunderstanding..
- jWow! Scalia and Thomas came down on the side of people!!!
- Sounds like a BAD decision to me.
- re: CNN: "High court OKs personal property seizures"
