Current Events » in reply to re: Nobody said freedom was cheap.

The whole thread (79 posts)

• has anyone mentioned here Bush's acknowledging 30,000 Civilian casualties in Iraq? - Daniel - 12/15/2005 12:19:11 AM
  • re: has anyone mentioned that this is hardly news? - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 4:01:20 AM
    • You dont seem to grasp the fact.... - R.L. - 12/15/2005 9:48:47 AM
      • :) Just waiting for irrelavent comparisons to WW2 - R.L. - 12/15/2005 9:57:17 AM
        • Nobody said freedom was cheap. - Scott Evil - 12/15/2005 5:54:03 PM
          • What price freedom/ - Doug Ellison - 12/15/2005 11:21:26 PM
            • re: What price freedom/ - SDG - 12/16/2005 5:08:01 PM
              • Freedom vs Lives is not a valid equation - azstrummer - 12/16/2005 7:20:52 PM
            • The scary part is......... - Lindy - 12/16/2005 12:33:44 AM
          • re: Nobody said freedom was cheap. - az - 12/15/2005 6:36:53 PM
            • Okay, now I'm really confused. - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 6:47:10 PM
              • re: Okay, now I'm really confused. - azstrummer - 12/15/2005 7:17:01 PM
                • Isolationism - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 7:37:06 PM
                  • This thread is about Iraq. - Doug Ellisont - 12/15/2005 11:26:53 PM
                    • re: This thread is about Iraq. - azstrummer - 12/16/2005 3:25:08 PM
                    • re: This thread is about Iraq. - Tom Brosz - 12/16/2005 12:09:50 AM
                  • re: Isolationism - azstrummer - 12/15/2005 7:49:21 PM
                    • re: Isolationism - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 8:56:30 PM
                      • We were asking for it? - azstrummer - 12/16/2005 8:08:19 PM
                      • We were asking for it? - azstrummer - 12/16/2005 8:04:31 PM
                        • Non-threatening - Tom Brosz - 12/16/2005 8:58:31 PM
            • re: Nobody said freedom was cheap. - azstrummer - 12/15/2005 6:37:40 PM
          • Liberals don't do "alternatives." - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 6:04:04 PM
    • OK, so it includes military casualties. And it's not new information either. - Daniel - 12/15/2005 7:25:39 AM
      • We went over a lot of this a long time ago. - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 5:59:20 PM
        • Is it your suggestion the US should now invade Iran? (n/t) - Publius - 12/16/2005 2:55:36 PM
        • re: We went over a lot of this a long time ago. - azstrummer - 12/15/2005 6:42:03 PM
  • Never mind - Donald - 12/15/2005 2:10:44 AM
    • Good point but - Buck Galaxy - 12/15/2005 9:36:05 AM
      • yes those elections are very good news. Think of this though: - Daniel - 12/15/2005 12:56:29 PM
        • I've got a better one. - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 6:02:16 PM
          • Freedom and democracy...and where would that be? - azstrummer - 12/15/2005 6:45:34 PM
            • that's not really the point here - Daniel - 12/16/2005 2:38:17 AM
              • "Could anyone still say, 'this is worth 30,000 deaths'?" - Tom Brosz - 12/16/2005 8:08:47 AM
                • "The Iraqis will decide if the toll is worth it or not." - R.L. - 12/16/2005 7:09:48 PM
                • it is exactly our question to answer, as it was OUR governments which initiated the invasion (n/t) - Daniel - 12/16/2005 9:30:11 AM
                • it is exactly our question to answer, as it was OUR governments which initiated the invasion (n/t) - Daniel - 12/16/2005 9:29:58 AM
                • More on Iraqi memories of Saddam - Tom Brosz - 12/16/2005 8:59:46 AM
                  • yep credit is due to the benefits - Daniel - 12/16/2005 9:49:50 AM
            • Get real. - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 7:39:21 PM
              • re: Get real. - azstrummer - 12/15/2005 8:22:45 PM
                • re: Get real, continued. - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 8:59:13 PM
                  • re: Get real, continued. - Azstrummer - 12/16/2005 7:31:49 PM
        • re: See the alternate timeline and please tell me where my assumptions are wrong. - Scott Evil - 12/15/2005 5:56:40 PM
          • your assumptions were your assumptions. can't be wrong. (n/t) - alcaray - 12/15/2005 7:36:04 PM
  • re: has anyone mentioned here Bush's acknowledging 30,000 Civilian casualties in Iraq? - SDG - 12/15/2005 12:58:25 AM
    • Good post. - Scott Evil - 12/15/2005 6:03:11 PM
    • NOW you want to critically question your president? - R.L. - 12/15/2005 9:52:57 AM
      • re: NOW you want to critically question your president? - SDG - 12/15/2005 4:01:59 PM
  • Well, they were going to die sometime anyway, so Bush isn't really responsible. - Bowser - 12/15/2005 12:50:26 AM
  • "I ask merely for information......." - Lindy - 12/15/2005 12:45:41 AM
    • Meanwhile, as the American Left desperately prays for failure... - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 4:06:21 AM
      • We know the election is going to be a success.....Katherine Harris was placed in charge... - Publius - 12/15/2005 10:45:37 PM
        • I'll admit, the 2002 election in Iraq was much smoother. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/16/2005 12:11:39 AM
          • re: I'll admit, the 2002 election in Iraq was much smoother. - Lindy - 12/16/2005 4:50:38 PM
          • LOL (n/t) - SDG - 12/16/2005 1:01:31 AM
      • So which finger has the paint on it? - azstrummer - 12/15/2005 5:30:31 PM
        • Are you trying to validate Tom's post? - SteveS - 12/15/2005 8:06:40 PM
          • re: Are you trying to validate Tom's post? - azstrummer - 12/15/2005 8:25:19 PM
            • re: Are you trying to validate Tom's post? - SteveS - 12/15/2005 9:24:06 PM
              • IMHO Tom's posts are invalid by default - azstrummer - 12/16/2005 3:44:54 PM
                • re: IMHO Tom's posts are invalid by default - SteveS - 12/16/2005 7:36:09 PM
                  • The support he provides is hardly balanced. - azstrummer - 12/16/2005 10:14:59 PM
                    • Wow. - Tom Brosz - 12/17/2005 3:48:07 AM
      • Dear Tom, F*** off. (n/t) - Tony - 12/15/2005 1:41:07 PM
        • Yeah, right. - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 6:19:54 PM
          • Same as your first reaction: - alcaray - 12/17/2005 6:43:17 PM
          • Wishful thinking hardly makes that worth replying to. - azstrummer - 12/15/2005 7:21:48 PM
            • Yeah, the same indignant blowfish response again. - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 7:41:10 PM
        • I see the old adage about a picture saying a thousand words still holds true. - Scott Evil - 12/15/2005 6:06:26 PM
        • Steady on, old chap - Sam F. - 12/15/2005 4:41:37 PM
          • Yeah that's right, the Brits were not involved were they - Daniel - 12/15/2005 4:57:27 PM
            • Tom said the "American Left" - Sam F. - 12/16/2005 8:19:46 AM
      • re: Meanwhile, as the American Left desperately prays for failure... - Doug Ellison - 12/15/2005 11:04:30 AM
        • Q.E.D. - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 6:14:08 PM
        • re: Meanwhile, as the American Left desperately prays for failure... - azstrummer - 12/15/2005 5:29:14 PM
      • Is that a purple chad? (n/t) - Lindy - 12/15/2005 4:14:25 AM
        • No. - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 4:35:02 AM
          • Chad or no chad...Its a beautiful thing. - Scott Evil - 12/15/2005 6:13:21 PM