Do you support the goal of establishing permanent Republican Party rule and giving up on democracy in America?
Wow. If that question was any more loaded it would pass out.
Assuming the idiotic fiction that somehow the election process will be neutralized forever, and given the choice between only those two parties in permanent power, which is like picking between strychnine and cyanide, I'll take the Republicans as the lesser of two evils. Happy?
As long as we're talking fantasies, how about a libertarian revolution, and Washington D.C. entering a long retirement as a historical tourist attraction and senators and congressmen finding their natural level selling snowglobes on the Mall?
Although they haven't written a book about it (since when does a talk show host's book keep you awake at night?), the Democratic Party is just as enthusiastic about neutralizing the Republican Party and obtaining a permanent majority in government. To emphasize my point, the Democrats want exactly the same thing. Does that bother you?
Again, where was all the concern from all the Sons of Liberty on the Left about "the destruction of democracy" when the Democrats held the entire government? Just one example please. I'll wait.
How long was the Liberal Party in Canada running things? Anybody concerned? I wasn't.
You want to know what I would really like to see? Realistic, not fantasy? I'd like to see some of the ridiculous level of power currently centralized in Washington returned to the state and local level. I want to see education, social spending, civil defense, and many other things becoming state and local issues. I want to see the Federal government out of the business of regulating and controlling almost every aspect of everything that is done in this country.
I want to see the Federal government's power reduced to the point where our presidential elections are no longer the equivalent of electing a goddam Emperor. It shouldn't be that critical to our existence who the president is.
Jerry Pournelle said that when he was young, it was more important to the average person who the Mayor was than who the President was. I like that.
Flame » in reply to "impending theocratic dictatorship"?
All right then.
The whole thread (74 posts)
- A nature sighting from the California Government Commie Preserve
- Okay, fine.
- A nature sighting from the RNC McCarthyite Preserve
- Gawd, it's getting hot in here.....
- The point, which continously escapes people here...
- The points which escape you...
- "Soft" Marxism.
- That pic was from Sweden, right? (n/t)
- Sweden isn't Marxist, and you know it.
- re: I don't
- You're being obtuse, and you know it.
- re: obtuse
- obtuse deflection
- Noooo, you never conflate marxism and socialism........
- And brave libertarian Tom is silent...
- re: And brave libertarian Tom is silent...
- Socialists believe that government should provide a certain basic level of support for individuals...
- You never have positively contributed to any discussion
- Laugh it up.
- re: And brave libertarian Tom is silent...
- OUCH (n/t)
- And brave libertarian Tom is silent...
- re: obtuse
- Could have sworn that you have ranted that Sweden was Marxist.
- and the subject line goes "pop!"
- Sweden isn't Marxist, and you know it.
- That pic was from Sweden, right? (n/t)
- "Soft" Marxism.
- Kill off 350k Americans (plus or minus) and try to take over the world and it leaves a bad taste in our mouths
- Now that I think about it...
- The points which escape you...
