Some conservative commentators might indeed have objected to the commercial use, and a possible indication of lack of respect for the flag. But you noticed that wasn't one of the problems this particular writer listed, was it?
You might also note that the flag itself is almost secondary to what I considered the more important point: the writer's attitudes, including a contempt for patriotism and for average Americans, or as he puts it, the people who live in "those places."
Maybe you missed all that in your focus on the superficial point.
And please, I've heard a number of liberals on talk radio try the "it's okay to burn a flag if you're disposing of it" gag. It's not fooling anyone. An eight-year-old knows the difference between a Boy Scout troop reverently disposing of an old, damaged flag, and some punk burning one out of hate while screaming that all the evil in the world is Amerikkka's fault.
It's okay to bury a person, too. But only after they're dead.
Off Topic » in reply to commercial exploitation of the flag
Nice try.
The whole thread (91 posts)
- Another liberal with flag allergies...
- re:Flags are ok for sport events...but
- Americans are weird about their flag, in general.
- I have no problems with the flag.
- commercial exploitation of the flag
- Nice try.
- It really DOES matter where you live.
- Woah! Just noticed this:
- re: It really DOES matter where you live.
- re: It really DOES matter where you live.
- Tolerance.
- Tolerance.
- Proof of your "urban vs. non-urban" point
- re: Proof of your "urban vs. non-urban" point
- re: Proof .......cows and sheep vote red (n/t)
- re: Proof of your "urban vs. non-urban" point
- "How ya gonna keep 'em down on the farm..."
- On small town values
- re: Proof of your "urban vs. non-urban" point
