You certainly gave us two entirely differerent perspectives, seeing as the second link was from a "revisionist" site dedicated to the most ludicrous cause in modern historical scholarship: Holocaust Denial.
Assuming that the letter from the RJF you re-quoted is legitimate, it was written two years before the scheisse hit the fan for German Jews - the Nuremberg Laws - and therefore reflects either [a] a well-meaning effort to keep things from getting worse (by placating the bullies, maybe they'll go away...see also Neville Chamberlain); [b] a denial that things not only could, but unstoppably would get worse (e.g., The Wall, by John Hersey, about the Warsaw Ghetto. The conscious, willing refusal to see disaster approaching is common, not just in the history of 20th C. European Jewry); [c] a combination of both.
In any case, five years of gradually increasing anti-Jewish activity by the Reich transpired between that letter from the RJF and Kristallnacht. That letter may have been indiciative of its time, but not of the continuum. I emphasize this as a caution for readers who might, inadvertantly or otherwise, take that letter out of its much larger context.
Thank you for posting on the boycott - I had not known of its existance, though the "survivor's guilt" of American Jews in general (mentioned in the opening paragraph of your first link) is very familiar. Also familiar was the factionalism that plagued the victims and the bystanders (see again The Wall), which that article explains, in part.
And thanks for the link to the Jewish Virtual Library - it's bookmarked now.
Current Events » in reply to Footnote -- Jewish boycott of German goods
Sehr interessant - vielen Dank!
The whole thread (78 posts)
- Think Tank: U.S. Overstated Iraqi Threat
- re: U.S. Overstated Iraqi Threat
- Clinton and Iraq
- Does that 'sacred right' trump our national safety?
- Hello 911
- P.S.
- "Self-determination?" Are you serious??
- re: And are you serious?
- You wrote: "International law doesn't care what's going on inside a country, as long as it doesn't interfere with other countries." My anwswer: Then International Law in its current form is immoral a…
- So you don't believe in national sovereignty?
- Yes, I really like being lectured on the cruelty of capital punishment by such gentle countries as Germany, which has always treated all minorities with respect. (n/t)
- re: Send some time with them, it helps
- I'm sure the Germans likewise appreciate Americans scolding them about genocide, since we have an outstanding background with our Native nations.
- Yes, I really like being lectured on the cruelty of capital punishment by such gentle countries as Germany, which has always treated all minorities with respect. (n/t)
- re: International law is IN-TER-NA-TIO-NAL !
- So you don't believe in national sovereignty?
- So why did NATO bombard Eastern Europe? (n/t)
- re: And are you serious?
- re: Not Pacifism, but Humiliation
- You seem to be overlooking...
- Speaking of perspective...
- re: You seem to be overlooking...
- Footnote -- Jewish boycott of German goods
- Sehr interessant - vielen Dank!
- re: Footnote -- Jewish boycott of German goods
- Pacifism, aggression and forgiveness
- re: Pacifism, aggression and forgiveness
- re: Pacifism, aggression and forgiveness
- Tell it to Martin Luther King.
- Pacifism, aggression and forgiveness
- And you've got to admit that the use of the words "self-determination" in any reference to Saddam's Iraq is a total absurdity. (n/t)
- You wrote: "International law doesn't care what's going on inside a country, as long as it doesn't interfere with other countries." My anwswer: Then International Law in its current form is immoral a…
- re: And are you serious?
- Clinton and Iraq
- Powell on the the 'Think Tank' and other peanut gallery spectators:
- re: Think Tank
- Meanwhile: US withdraws Iraq weapons team
- re: U.S. Overstated Iraqi Threat
