Euthanasia is about people being able to choose how they live and how they die. No sane person is running around claiming we should kill disabled people (Dont bother finding an example of someone advocating just that, I am sure you can find somone- I said 'No SANE person')...
Eugenics is the killing of people based on some concept of what is 'acceptable'...
You are trying to change the subject by bringing up hints of Nazi horrors. That is dishonest and vulgar...
I want you to answer the following honestly: Would you want to be kept alive in a situation like Terri's?
Answer it honestly...
If your answer is 'NO' then lets pretend that you dont have a living will and the only statements you made to that effect were oral... WOULD YOU RATHER YOUR WISHES BE DETERMINED BY THE COURTS OR WOULD YOU RATHER POLITICIANS DETERMINE WHAT YOU WOULD HAVE WANTED?
Current Events » in reply to Euthanasia is only one step removed from eugenics
Nonsense!
The whole thread (73 posts)
- The Schiavo tragedy has no business being politicized... (Tom, I am very disappointed with you)
- If you starved a dog to death, you'd go to jail
- And if you had a dog that was permanently crippled...
- re: And if you had a dog that was permanently crippled...
- re: And if you had a dog that was permanently crippled...
- re: And if you had a dog that was permanently crippled...
- Ask your wife to explain Compassionate Care to you (n/t)
- And if you had a dog that was permanently crippled...
- Its a private family matter
- re: The Schiavo tragedy has no business being politicized... (Tom, I am very disappointed with you)
- Why will the husband accept no solution other than her death? Maybe because he promised her.
- re: The Schiavo tragedy has no business being politicized... (Tom, I am very disappointed with you)
- "IF she had a living will stating that she didnt want such measures to be taken to keep her alive, would there be this debate?"
- The real story
- If you starved a dog to death, you'd go to jail
